On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:17:28AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:

> The 2nd syntax is simpler and clearer, but the properties of the CPU
> DAI and of the CODEC DAI are the same in the container (format, clock
> and PCM slots). Is this a problem?

Yes, things like clocks might be different.  We need a way to specify
DAI specific properties.

> BTW, there is a 'dai_fmt' in the DAI link, but this format is not used
> in the simple-card. Why?

Could you be more specific please?  If you mean the dai_fmt feature of
the generic dai_link struct then because of the confusion about what
the DAI formats mean which you'll have seen on the list.