From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: at91: Document new TCB bindings Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 14:31:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20170407123132.ety26gj7sak5lr6t@piout.net> References: <1467039901-11297-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20160701012743.GA16698@rob-hp-laptop> <20160704151058.44b679bf@bbrezillon> <20170125161129.41acaa9a@bbrezillon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Boris Brezillon , Rob Herring , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thierry Reding , Linux PWM List , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/04/2017 at 14:15:36 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> What's your solution for this case? > > > > It seems that we don't have any progress on this topic for more than 6 > > months which is a pity as we now experience an issue that would have > > been addressed completely by the TC rework [1]. > > > > aka "ping"... ;-) > > > Hi Nicolas, Boris, > > is there any news from your side ? > I'm planning to resubmit news bindings and the full rework when I'll have time to work on that. But I must admit I don't quite see the issue with the proposed bindings. Also, we are starting to see more and more flexible timer IPs that can be used as RTC, timer, pwm, counters, quad decoders. I'm starting to think we may need a new subsystem. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com