Hi, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 08:49:59AM +0100, Mylène Josserand wrote: > Add 3 registers needed for MCPM (ie SMP): prcm, cpucfg and r_cpucfg. > prcm and cpucfg are identical with sun9i-a80. The only difference > is the r_cpucfg that does not exist on sun9i. > > Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi > index a384b766f3dc..eeb2e7d0d6dc 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi > @@ -323,6 +323,16 @@ > #reset-cells = <1>; > }; > + cpucfg@01700000 { Please drop the leading zero here, it generates a warning in dtc. > + compatible = "allwinner,sun9i-a80-cpucfg"; There's some significant differences between the A83t and the A80 IPs, you should use a different compatible. > + reg = <0x01700000 0x100>; the size is 1k (0x400) > + }; > + > + r_cpucfg@1f01c00 { > + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-cpucfg"; > + reg = <0x1f01c00 0x100>; You should order the nodes by physical address > + }; > + > pio: pinctrl@1c20800 { > compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-pinctrl"; > interrupts = , > @@ -493,6 +503,11 @@ > interrupts = ; > }; > > + prcm@1f01400 { > + compatible = "allwinner,sun9i-a80-prcm"; That block is significantly different on the A83t. Please use a different compatible. > + reg = <0x1f01400 0x200>; > + }; > + The size is 1k, again. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com