From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: spear600: Add missing interrupt-parent of rtc Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:17:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20180114131724.GN2678@piout.net> References: <20180112020711.6gp2pnsxxjzelidq@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Olof Johansson , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , arm-soc , Arnd Bergmann , Viresh Kumar , Rob Herring , Linux ARM List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 14/01/2018 at 12:17:23 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:28:51AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> The interrupt-parent of rtc was missing, add it. > >> > >> Fixes: 8113ba917dfa ("ARM: SPEAr: DT: Update device nodes") > >> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org # v3.8+ > >> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann > >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > > > > Applied to next/dt. Is stable really needed on this? It's been broken since > > pretty much forever, and nobody has complained... :) > > The SPEAr architecture is widely used (in modified variants) by > a large industrial automation company, 20+ years of support cycle. > > However I think they have a forked both kernel and hardware, so they > will not notice any time soon, and when they eventually upgrade they > can simply pick the latest I guess. > We have a customer using mainline v4.14 on their Spear600 based products. I guess the reason why nobody complained is simply because nobody is using the SoC RTC ;) -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html