From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Rosin Subject: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: at24: add compatible for nxp,se97b Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:06:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20180116160618.27859-3-peda@axentia.se> References: <20180116160618.27859-1-peda@axentia.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180116160618.27859-1-peda@axentia.se> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Russell King , Rob Herring , Alexandre Belloni , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Peter Rosin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt index abfae1beca2b..edf9247613f6 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Required properties: Some vendors use different model names for chips which are just variants of the above. Known such exceptions are listed below: + "nxp,se97b" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02", "renesas,r1ex24002" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02" - reg: The I2C address of the EEPROM. -- 2.11.0