From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org,
yanhe@quicinc.com, ramkri@qti.qualcomm.com, sdharia@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: make bam clk optional
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 11:22:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119055221.GV18649@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180116190236.14558-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 07:02:33PM +0000, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>
> When BAM is remotely controlled it does not sound correct to control
> its clk on Linux side. Make it optional, so that its not madatory
s/madatory/mandatory
> for remote controlled BAM instances.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> index 03c4eb3fd314..78e488e8f96d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> @@ -1180,13 +1180,14 @@ static int bam_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "qcom,controlled-remotely");
>
> bdev->bamclk = devm_clk_get(bdev->dev, "bam_clk");
but you still do clk_get unconditionally?
> - if (IS_ERR(bdev->bamclk))
> - return PTR_ERR(bdev->bamclk);
> -
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(bdev->bamclk);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(bdev->dev, "failed to prepare/enable clock\n");
> - return ret;
> + if (IS_ERR(bdev->bamclk)) {
> + bdev->bamclk = NULL;
> + } else {
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(bdev->bamclk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(bdev->dev, "failed to prepare/enable clock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
wouldn't it be better to set that an instance is remote controlled and thus
not at all visible to Linux?
> }
>
> ret = bam_init(bdev);
> --
> 2.15.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-16 19:02 [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: fixes for remotely controlled bam srinivas.kandagatla
2018-01-16 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: make bam clk optional srinivas.kandagatla
2018-01-16 19:38 ` Sagar Dharia
2018-01-17 9:46 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-01-19 5:52 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2018-01-22 9:55 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
[not found] ` <8dfa8ba1-6e98-a8e4-614c-592861cef571-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-23 9:19 ` Vinod Koul
2018-01-23 9:20 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-01-16 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: do not write to global regs in remote mode srinivas.kandagatla
2018-01-16 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Add num-ees dt binding for remotely controlled srinivas.kandagatla
[not found] ` <20180116190236.14558-5-srinivas.kandagatla-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-29 16:21 ` Rob Herring
2018-01-30 9:18 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
[not found] ` <20180116190236.14558-1-srinivas.kandagatla-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-16 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: add num-channels " srinivas.kandagatla-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A
2018-01-19 5:55 ` Vinod Koul
2018-01-22 9:55 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
[not found] ` <20180116190236.14558-3-srinivas.kandagatla-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2018-01-29 16:19 ` Rob Herring
2018-01-17 10:18 ` [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: fixes for remotely controlled bam Vinod Koul
2018-01-17 10:55 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-01-17 15:59 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180119055221.GV18649@localhost \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ramkri@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sdharia@quicinc.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=yanhe@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).