From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: add basic DTS for i.MX8MQ
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:40:55 +0800
Message-ID: <20180123014054.GB27764@dragon>
References: <20180117183244.28303-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
 <20180117183244.28303-2-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
 <20180122144729.GA27764@dragon>
 <CAK8P3a0Yq1WuUYih6WKbbjoGRwq-rCQ8OEpuyu0=-SOVV2MNLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1516643421.25726.17.camel@pengutronix.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1516643421.25726.17.camel@pengutronix.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> The nice thing about the split into Freescale/NXP is that it nicely
> separates the Layerscape and i.MX stuff, which are two quite different
> architectures.

With more and more IPs shared between Layerscape and i.MX, the boundary
of these two architectures becomes blurry.

> But that's just a nice coincidence and I'll happily
> rework the patches to whatever suits the maintainers most. Please make
> a judgement call.

Let's put them into 'freescale' folder.  Thanks.

Shawn