On Tue 2018-01-30 11:32:38, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> > Well, notice I'm converting existing driver to device tree. And that
> > one already has GPIO dependency. It is possible that more work needs
> > to be done there, but that should not be a reason to delay this. Feel
> > free to help.
> 
> No, it's a very good reason to delay merging something.  A DT binding is
> an ABI so we need to sort out interface issues and describe things as
> well as we can, with board files it's not an ABI so we can just do any
> old thing that happens to work and while it might not be ideal it
> doesn't really matter since we can change it later if we need to.

Whatever.

Turns out this was GPIO after all.

I believe power-gpio and reset-gpio are equiavalent, with different
polarity. (After all, devices in reset consume less power).

If you prefer one solution over another, let me know...

									Pavel


-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html