From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995-draak: Enable DU Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:52:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20180215165210.lsreissnzg4wxtgp@verge.net.au> References: <1518683903-10681-1-git-send-email-kbingham@kernel.org> <1518683903-10681-7-git-send-email-kbingham@kernel.org> <6281511.bskcdgqsgb@avalon> <8b2c853c-2963-a116-a246-5fdb30b0688e@ideasonboard.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8b2c853c-2963-a116-a246-5fdb30b0688e@ideasonboard.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kieran Bingham Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Ulrich Hecht , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, geert@glider.be, Kieran Bingham , Magnus Damm , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , open list List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:30:28PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Hi Laurent, Simon, > > On 15/02/18 14:12, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Kieran, > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > > > On Thursday, 15 February 2018 10:38:21 EET Kieran Bingham wrote: > >> From: Kieran Bingham > >> > >> Enable the DU, providing only the VGA output for now. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > > I assume Simon will take care of this patch. > > That will be great, - One small caveat on this patch though: > > > >> --- > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995-draak.dts | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995-draak.dts > >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995-draak.dts index > >> af07da240be0..668e246dfc5d 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995-draak.dts > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995-draak.dts > >> @@ -27,6 +27,38 @@ > >> stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; > >> }; > >> > >> + vga { > >> + compatible = "vga-connector"; > >> + > >> + port { > >> + vga_in: endpoint { > >> + remote-endpoint = <&adv7123_out>; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> + > >> + vga-encoder { > >> + compatible = "adi,adv7123"; > >> + > >> + ports { > >> + #address-cells = <1>; > >> + #size-cells = <0>; > >> + > >> + port@0 { > >> + reg = <0>; > >> + adv7123_in: endpoint { > >> + remote-endpoint = <&du_out_rgb>; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> + port@1 { > >> + reg = <1>; > >> + adv7123_out: endpoint { > >> + remote-endpoint = <&vga_in>; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> + }; > >> + > >> memory@48000000 { > >> device_type = "memory"; > >> /* first 128MB is reserved for secure area. */ > >> @@ -46,6 +78,11 @@ > >> }; > >> }; > >> > >> + du_pins: du { > >> + groups = "du_rgb888", "du_sync", "du_disp", "du_dotclkout0"; > > The du_dotclkout0 is named differently in Uli's patch. (Of course I believe my > version is correct, but there is some precedent set it would seem). > > Anyway, If Uli's version of the PFC is accepted (Which I'm sure it will be), > then I will have to re-spin this patch with the 'different' "du_clk_out_0" value > in the groups. Thanks, please repost once this has been shaken out.