Hi,

Am I supposed to do something more to make this patchset picked up?

Thanks,
Marcus Folkesson

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 09:08:41PM +0100, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> watchdog_init_timeout() will allways pick timeout_param since it
> defaults to a valid timeout.
> 
> Following best practice described in
> Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt to make use of
> the parameter logic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v3:
>     	- Use wdd->timeout instead of wdt_timeout when print out
>     	  timout in probe function.
> 
>  drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> index 0ae947c3d7bc..255169916dbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sama5d4_wdt.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct sama5d4_wdt {
>  	unsigned long		last_ping;
>  };
>  
> -static int wdt_timeout = WDT_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
> +static int wdt_timeout;
>  static bool nowayout = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT;
>  
>  module_param(wdt_timeout, int, 0);
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int sama5d4_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	wdd = &wdt->wdd;
> -	wdd->timeout = wdt_timeout;
> +	wdd->timeout = WDT_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
>  	wdd->info = &sama5d4_wdt_info;
>  	wdd->ops = &sama5d4_wdt_ops;
>  	wdd->min_timeout = MIN_WDT_TIMEOUT;
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int sama5d4_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, wdt);
>  
>  	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "initialized (timeout = %d sec, nowayout = %d)\n",
> -		 wdt_timeout, nowayout);
> +		 wdd->timeout, nowayout);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.15.1
>