From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Corentin Labbe Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: dts: allwinner: Add devicetree for pine H64 modelA evaluation board Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:17:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20190814131741.GB24324@Red> References: <20190808084253.10573-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20190812094000.ebdmhyxx7xzbevef@flea> Reply-To: clabbe.montjoie-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190812094000.ebdmhyxx7xzbevef@flea> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Maxime Ripard Cc: mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:40:00AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote: > > This patch adds the evaluation variant of the model A of the PineH64. > > The model A has the same size of the pine64 and has a PCIE slot. > > > > The only devicetree difference with current pineH64, is the PHY > > regulator. > > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile | 1 + > > .../sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile > > index f6db0611cb85..9a02166cbf72 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile > > @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-orangepi-3.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-orangepi-lite2.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-orangepi-one-plus.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dtb > > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dtb > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..d8ff02747efe > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-pine-h64-modelA-eval.dts > > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ or MIT) > > +/* > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Corentin Labbe > > + */ > > + > > +#include "sun50i-h6-pine-h64.dts" > > + > > +/ { > > + model = "Pine H64 model A evaluation board"; > > + compatible = "pine64,pine-h64-modelA-eval", "allwinner,sun50i-h6"; > > + > > + reg_gmac_3v3: gmac-3v3 { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + regulator-name = "vcc-gmac-3v3"; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; > > + startup-delay-us = <100000>; > > + gpio = <&pio 2 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + enable-active-high; > > + }; > > + > > +}; > > + > > +&emac { > > + phy-supply = <®_gmac_3v3>; > > +}; > > I might be missing some context here, but I'm pretty sure that the > initial intent of the pine h64 DTS was to support the model A all > along. > The regulator changed between modelA and B. See this old patchset (supporting modelA) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10539149/ for example.