From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A988C43331 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D408F21D7F for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:55:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573520149; bh=P23uXxnqZM/BL6bAsTDyEXMWrYv7ZgC/aU5T2D3OpDc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=IKLnhLX6uPjSZZtZYrrK7LlfLkI6rq5qQhjSu2B2LYGQLk/neRT18G7ZcJ++fIEnB GBEaNo0IIRxl8JAbzzuWQ03RF+7v5vSAjEqtxe6sh7OhDX5a0m1QYJmzc7Zpcsvv6t E399coHjT0ZvhFGoos3lHxntobhklpP2Gqa0pzBk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727153AbfKLAzq (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:55:46 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com ([209.85.167.195]:37189 "EHLO mail-oi1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726906AbfKLAzq (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:55:46 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id y194so13281971oie.4; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:55:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=S1Rkl+7YzBL7zyaCWJBYcYMMFhNkSGP8H9icKQ+dNa8=; b=FfzluQdxz/qmBJz8mcVYsfOGfY11t2vYFVZzNXqRBBCu8qpHN0PYLk7ViIDuFkCk1y dCnqcypa4LXo7LyCnN46J+jsZW4yDrCPSrgFkEMJzAFuMWunOD9MnVsk7UgF8K4X8oMh GyIz4W5vPcs9Vw802589hhxiw0T2n0iYCjDN4HcBJLaF9DIwy+curm6+RvGAO7cdNvhf N8z9BUV/lA1B5B8Mf9ABtN369EDHAsQnTwqs1ChTCGquP4UCbFhLG7nabYqFzqDmGQo+ 8T54/XvAp31Fi0Kzjd42Bu/wbfdI45fNtDhennr9R5uKccRisfAzj12s4JHCq75MOwr1 Mrug== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWK835qij3GSdVu9EAw6u/nGW9izmJaSfjrZv1iEkwX7VzyFxUB 9h6YxCSaMkbAJDKlH6VvrQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwt7XIRcL/jlfvvYa/NNzx3/HJnxiWONynmSjKMMkTErHPnguu5aT+y+yjgDRvLGCRzhwmmOQ== X-Received: by 2002:aca:3e8a:: with SMTP id l132mr1559897oia.146.1573520145339; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:55:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm5620622oty.58.2019.11.11.16.55.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:55:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:55:44 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Zhou Yanjie Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, paul.burton@mips.com, sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, syq@debian.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, paul@crapouillou.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] dt-bindings: clock: Add X1000 bindings. Message-ID: <20191112005544.GB7038@bogus> References: <1571421006-12771-1-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@zoho.com> <1573378102-72380-1-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@zoho.com> <1573378102-72380-2-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@zoho.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1573378102-72380-2-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@zoho.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:28:21 +0800, Zhou Yanjie wrote: > Add the clock bindings for the X1000 Soc from Ingenic. > > Signed-off-by: Zhou Yanjie > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.txt | 1 + > include/dt-bindings/clock/x1000-cgu.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/x1000-cgu.h > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.