From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92DEC432C0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEB02075C for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727215AbfKYKYh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 05:24:37 -0500 Received: from esa6.microchip.iphmx.com ([216.71.154.253]:23384 "EHLO esa6.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725828AbfKYKYh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 05:24:37 -0500 Received-SPF: Pass (esa6.microchip.iphmx.com: domain of Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com designates 198.175.253.82 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.175.253.82; receiver=esa6.microchip.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com"; x-sender="Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 mx a:ushub1.microchip.com a:smtpout.microchip.com -exists:%{i}.spf.microchip.iphmx.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:mktomail.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa6.microchip.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@email.microchip.com) identity=helo; client-ip=198.175.253.82; receiver=esa6.microchip.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com"; x-sender="postmaster@email.microchip.com"; x-conformance=spf_only Authentication-Results: esa6.microchip.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@email.microchip.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) d=microchip.com IronPort-SDR: 9WZjFYDuuuaK/eNGnTNB5mDz/ZTnKSiyPGKejqZNaswo3vvjMh4/kKc9PBVoXqCb1KF37wOtRj ApXTRXVUDDJ0PQxJdU/oNYChL1u/VdJQhuVa/a2xYk8Y3Ax7NikTBpmbANMRPL2n/d0SaGCsrh aeyM4wM9vARBA4o5yWHLh8FPA7e14i1WPP2W+gJINwge9agTYXpVFu2ux29MoHMZVFbeIwEweN cGq4nVlfSqhENpJ3GuN2DFmr4G0FxGBD24KKf2it8C29qnyZN0jkPGLdzPnFbfZrYC+AGDfOuQ Lrw= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,241,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="55524063" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 25 Nov 2019 03:24:35 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 03:24:34 -0700 Received: from M43218.microchip.com (10.10.85.251) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 03:24:31 -0700 From: Ludovic Desroches To: , , CC: , , , , , , , , , "Ludovic Desroches" Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: rework clocks management to support SAM9x60 device Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:24:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20191125102415.11341-1-ludovic.desroches@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 In-Reply-To: <1351fc1a-3d07-4a56-2622-07ea92727c4f@intel.com> References: <1351fc1a-3d07-4a56-2622-07ea92727c4f@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org In the SAM9x60 SoC, there are only two clocks instead of three for the SDHCI device. The base clk is no longer provided, it is generated internally from the mult clk. The values of the base clk and mul in the capabilities registers may not reflect the reality as the mult clk is a programmable clock which can take several rates. As we can't trust those values, take them from the clock tree and update the capabilities according to. As we can have the same pitfall, in some cases, with the SAMA5D2 Soc, stop relying on capabilities too. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches --- Thanks Adrian for pointing out the typo. It's fixed and re-tested. Let me know if you want to me to resend the full serie or if it's ok. Regards Ludovic drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c index 5959e394b416..b95ac4b27f22 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c @@ -33,7 +33,14 @@ #define SDHCI_AT91_PRESET_COMMON_CONF 0x400 /* drv type B, programmable clock mode */ +struct sdhci_at91_soc_data { + const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata; + bool baseclk_is_generated_internally; + unsigned int divider_for_baseclk; +}; + struct sdhci_at91_priv { + const struct sdhci_at91_soc_data *soc_data; struct clk *hclock; struct clk *gck; struct clk *mainck; @@ -141,12 +148,24 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_at91_sama5d2_ops = { .set_power = sdhci_at91_set_power, }; -static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data soc_data_sama5d2 = { +static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_sama5d2_pdata = { .ops = &sdhci_at91_sama5d2_ops, }; +static const struct sdhci_at91_soc_data soc_data_sama5d2 = { + .pdata = &sdhci_sama5d2_pdata, + .baseclk_is_generated_internally = false, +}; + +static const struct sdhci_at91_soc_data soc_data_sam9x60 = { + .pdata = &sdhci_sama5d2_pdata, + .baseclk_is_generated_internally = true, + .divider_for_baseclk = 2, +}; + static const struct of_device_id sdhci_at91_dt_match[] = { { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-sdhci", .data = &soc_data_sama5d2 }, + { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-sdhci", .data = &soc_data_sam9x60 }, {} }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_at91_dt_match); @@ -156,50 +175,37 @@ static int sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev) struct sdhci_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); struct sdhci_at91_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); - int ret; unsigned int caps0, caps1; unsigned int clk_base, clk_mul; - unsigned int gck_rate, real_gck_rate; + unsigned int gck_rate, clk_base_rate; unsigned int preset_div; - /* - * The mult clock is provided by as a generated clock by the PMC - * controller. In order to set the rate of gck, we have to get the - * base clock rate and the clock mult from capabilities. - */ clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock); caps0 = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES); caps1 = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1); - clk_base = (caps0 & SDHCI_CLOCK_V3_BASE_MASK) >> SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_SHIFT; - clk_mul = (caps1 & SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_MASK) >> SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_SHIFT; - gck_rate = clk_base * 1000000 * (clk_mul + 1); - ret = clk_set_rate(priv->gck, gck_rate); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(dev, "failed to set gck"); - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->hclock); - return ret; - } - /* - * We need to check if we have the requested rate for gck because in - * some cases this rate could be not supported. If it happens, the rate - * is the closest one gck can provide. We have to update the value - * of clk mul. - */ - real_gck_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->gck); - if (real_gck_rate != gck_rate) { - clk_mul = real_gck_rate / (clk_base * 1000000) - 1; - caps1 &= (~SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_MASK); - caps1 |= ((clk_mul << SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_SHIFT) & - SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_MASK); - /* Set capabilities in r/w mode. */ - writel(SDMMC_CACR_KEY | SDMMC_CACR_CAPWREN, - host->ioaddr + SDMMC_CACR); - writel(caps1, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1); - /* Set capabilities in ro mode. */ - writel(0, host->ioaddr + SDMMC_CACR); - dev_info(dev, "update clk mul to %u as gck rate is %u Hz\n", - clk_mul, real_gck_rate); - } + + gck_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->gck); + if (priv->soc_data->baseclk_is_generated_internally) + clk_base_rate = gck_rate / priv->soc_data->divider_for_baseclk; + else + clk_base_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->mainck); + + clk_base = clk_base_rate / 1000000; + clk_mul = gck_rate / clk_base_rate - 1; + + caps0 &= (~SDHCI_CLOCK_V3_BASE_MASK); + caps0 |= ((clk_base << SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_SHIFT) & SDHCI_CLOCK_V3_BASE_MASK); + caps1 &= (~SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_MASK); + caps1 |= ((clk_mul << SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_SHIFT) & SDHCI_CLOCK_MUL_MASK); + /* Set capabilities in r/w mode. */ + writel(SDMMC_CACR_KEY | SDMMC_CACR_CAPWREN, host->ioaddr + SDMMC_CACR); + writel(caps0, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES); + writel(caps1, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1); + /* Set capabilities in ro mode. */ + writel(0, host->ioaddr + SDMMC_CACR); + + dev_info(dev, "update clk mul to %u as gck rate is %u Hz and clk base is %u Hz\n", + clk_mul, gck_rate, clk_base_rate); /* * We have to set preset values because it depends on the clk_mul @@ -207,19 +213,19 @@ static int sdhci_at91_set_clks_presets(struct device *dev) * maximum sd clock value is 120 MHz instead of 208 MHz. For that * reason, we need to use presets to support SDR104. */ - preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(real_gck_rate, 24000000) - 1; + preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(gck_rate, 24000000) - 1; writew(SDHCI_AT91_PRESET_COMMON_CONF | preset_div, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_PRESET_FOR_SDR12); - preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(real_gck_rate, 50000000) - 1; + preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(gck_rate, 50000000) - 1; writew(SDHCI_AT91_PRESET_COMMON_CONF | preset_div, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_PRESET_FOR_SDR25); - preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(real_gck_rate, 100000000) - 1; + preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(gck_rate, 100000000) - 1; writew(SDHCI_AT91_PRESET_COMMON_CONF | preset_div, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_PRESET_FOR_SDR50); - preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(real_gck_rate, 120000000) - 1; + preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(gck_rate, 120000000) - 1; writew(SDHCI_AT91_PRESET_COMMON_CONF | preset_div, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_PRESET_FOR_SDR104); - preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(real_gck_rate, 50000000) - 1; + preset_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(gck_rate, 50000000) - 1; writew(SDHCI_AT91_PRESET_COMMON_CONF | preset_div, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_PRESET_FOR_DDR50); @@ -314,7 +320,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops sdhci_at91_dev_pm_ops = { static int sdhci_at91_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { const struct of_device_id *match; - const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *soc_data; + const struct sdhci_at91_soc_data *soc_data; struct sdhci_host *host; struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host; struct sdhci_at91_priv *priv; @@ -325,17 +331,22 @@ static int sdhci_at91_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -EINVAL; soc_data = match->data; - host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, soc_data, sizeof(*priv)); + host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, soc_data->pdata, sizeof(*priv)); if (IS_ERR(host)) return PTR_ERR(host); pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); + priv->soc_data = soc_data; priv->mainck = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "baseclk"); if (IS_ERR(priv->mainck)) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get baseclk\n"); - return PTR_ERR(priv->mainck); + if (soc_data->baseclk_is_generated_internally) { + priv->mainck = NULL; + } else { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get baseclk\n"); + return PTR_ERR(priv->mainck); + } } priv->hclock = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "hclock"); -- 2.24.0