From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, TVD_SUBJ_WIPE_DEBT,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD527C432C0 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBF12075C for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="VKQR+Zj0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727587AbfKZRnA (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:43:00 -0500 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc ([85.214.55.253]:52988 "EHLO mail.andi.de1.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726200AbfKZRm7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:42:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20180802; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UJNRgJYokU+UFBwtU2ynndrvNCEKdJJFP6ze1hNesKA=; b=VKQR+Zj0Q2r4WCNqxVBEMXCJjm RRPVV3THF0fJGtGADLnmC3BHkJB8U1LtDHLaPwPHJlAQBz3ItPNT3J7gDYOaFtND5sNia0Ae0EW1+ NYUDqVaIHwiA2ZCjoGEkaup2w7a6HGwXYfTWOgZ30upF+ndNyu9OCENAbVNv71gvbTbQ=; Received: from p200300ccff0be6001a3da2fffebfd33a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:cc:ff0b:e600:1a3d:a2ff:febf:d33a] helo=aktux) by mail.andi.de1.cc with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZerL-0001ZJ-Vf; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:42:44 +0100 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:42:42 +0100 From: Andreas Kemnade To: Kalle Valo Cc: Discussions about the Letux Kernel , "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson , Greg Kroah-Hartman , kernel@pyra-handheld.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexios Zavras , Rob Herring , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [Letux-kernel] [PATCH 0/2] net: wireless: ti: wl1251: sdio: remove ti, power-gpio Message-ID: <20191126184242.365603a2@aktux> In-Reply-To: <0101016ea8691109-5beadf07-b3ba-4d31-a516-c7f3015f2316-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <0101016ea8691109-5beadf07-b3ba-4d31-a516-c7f3015f2316-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:51:28 +0000 Kalle Valo wrote: > "H. Nikolaus Schaller" writes: > > > The driver has been updated to use the mmc/sdio core > > which does full power control. So we do no longer need > > the power control gipo. > > > > Note that it is still needed for the SPI based interface > > (N900). > > > > Suggested by: Ulf Hansson > > Tested by: H. Nikolaus Schaller # OpenPandora 600MHz > > > > H. Nikolaus Schaller (2): > > DTS: bindings: wl1251: mark ti,power-gpio as optional > > net: wireless: ti: wl1251: sdio: remove ti,power-gpio > > > > .../bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt | 3 +- > > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c | 30 ------------------- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > Via which tree are these planned to go? Please always document that in > the cover letter so that maintainers don't need to guess. > Hmm, this is about bisect issues and the former misc pandora fix/cleanup series now in linux-next that make you doubt it should go via wireless/net? So the question is whether it depends on that? Regards, Andreas