devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Biwen Li <biwen.li@nxp.com>
To: peda@axentia.se, leoyang.li@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Biwen Li <biwen.li@nxp.com>
Subject: [v6,2/3] i2c: mux: pca954x: support property idle-state
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 17:22:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191129092222.2706-2-biwen.li@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191129092222.2706-1-biwen.li@nxp.com>

This supports property idle-state,if present,
overrides i2c-mux-idle-disconnect.

My use cases:
	- Use the property idle-state to fix
	  an errata on LS2085ARDB and LS2088ARDB.
	- Errata id: E-00013(board LS2085ARDB and
	  LS2088ARDB revision on Rev.B, Rev.C and Rev.D).
	- About E-00013:
	  - Description: I2C1 and I2C3 buses
	    are missing pull-up.
	  - Impact: When the PCA954x device is tri-stated, the I2C bus
	    will float. This makes the I2C bus and its associated
	    downstream devices inaccessible.
	  - Hardware fix: Populate resistors R189 and R190 for I2C1
	    and resistors R228 and R229 for I2C3.
	  - Software fix: Remove the tri-state option from the PCA954x
	    driver(PCA954x always on enable status, specify a
	    channel zero in dts to fix the errata E-00013).

Tested-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Biwen Li <biwen.li@nxp.com>
---
Change in v6:
	- adjust log

Change in v5:
	- add extra precaution for pca954x_init 	

Change in v4:
	- rename function
	  pca954x_calculate_chan -> pca954x_regval

Change in v3:
	- update subject and description
	- add a helper function pca954x_calculate_chan()

Change in v2:
	- update subject and description
	- add property idle-state

 drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
index cd8753b29a63..6577ec873f59 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct pca954x {
 
 	u8 last_chan;		/* last register value */
 	/* MUX_IDLE_AS_IS, MUX_IDLE_DISCONNECT or >= 0 for channel */
-	s8 idle_state;
+	s32 idle_state;
 
 	struct i2c_client *client;
 
@@ -237,20 +237,23 @@ static int pca954x_reg_write(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 				I2C_SMBUS_BYTE, &dummy);
 }
 
+static u8 pca954x_regval(struct pca954x *data, u8 chan)
+{
+	/* We make switches look like muxes, not sure how to be smarter. */
+	if (data->chip->muxtype == pca954x_ismux)
+		return chan | data->chip->enable;
+	else
+		return 1 << chan;
+}
+
 static int pca954x_select_chan(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)
 {
 	struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
 	struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
-	const struct chip_desc *chip = data->chip;
 	u8 regval;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	/* we make switches look like muxes, not sure how to be smarter */
-	if (chip->muxtype == pca954x_ismux)
-		regval = chan | chip->enable;
-	else
-		regval = 1 << chan;
-
+	regval = pca954x_regval(data, chan);
 	/* Only select the channel if its different from the last channel */
 	if (data->last_chan != regval) {
 		ret = pca954x_reg_write(muxc->parent, client, regval);
@@ -264,7 +267,7 @@ static int pca954x_deselect_mux(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)
 {
 	struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
 	struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
-	s8 idle_state;
+	s32 idle_state;
 
 	idle_state = READ_ONCE(data->idle_state);
 	if (idle_state >= 0)
@@ -410,6 +413,22 @@ static void pca954x_cleanup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc)
 	i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc);
 }
 
+static int pca954x_init(struct i2c_client *client, struct pca954x *data)
+{
+	int ret;
+	if (data->idle_state >= 0) {
+		data->last_chan = pca954x_regval(data, data->idle_state);
+	} else {
+		/* Disconnect multiplexer */
+		data->last_chan = 0;
+	}
+	ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte(client, data->last_chan);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		data->last_chan = 0;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * I2C init/probing/exit functions
  */
@@ -419,7 +438,6 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
 	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
-	bool idle_disconnect_dt;
 	struct gpio_desc *gpio;
 	struct i2c_mux_core *muxc;
 	struct pca954x *data;
@@ -470,23 +488,24 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Write the mux register at addr to verify
+	data->idle_state = MUX_IDLE_AS_IS;
+	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "idle-state", &data->idle_state)) {
+		if (np && of_property_read_bool(np, "i2c-mux-idle-disconnect"))
+			data->idle_state = MUX_IDLE_DISCONNECT;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Write the mux register at addr to verify
 	 * that the mux is in fact present. This also
-	 * initializes the mux to disconnected state.
+	 * initializes the mux to a channel
+	 * or disconnected state.
 	 */
-	if (i2c_smbus_write_byte(client, 0) < 0) {
+	ret = pca954x_init(client, data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_warn(dev, "probe failed\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	data->last_chan = 0;		   /* force the first selection */
-	data->idle_state = MUX_IDLE_AS_IS;
-
-	idle_disconnect_dt = np &&
-		of_property_read_bool(np, "i2c-mux-idle-disconnect");
-	if (idle_disconnect_dt)
-		data->idle_state = MUX_IDLE_DISCONNECT;
-
 	ret = pca954x_irq_setup(muxc);
 	if (ret)
 		goto fail_cleanup;
@@ -538,9 +557,13 @@ static int pca954x_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
 	struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 	struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc);
+	int ret;
 
-	data->last_chan = 0;
-	return i2c_smbus_write_byte(client, 0);
+	ret = pca954x_init(client, data);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to verify the mux, the mux maybe not present in fact\n");
+
+	return ret;
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-29  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-29  9:22 [v6,1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: support property idle-state Biwen Li
2019-11-29  9:22 ` Biwen Li [this message]
2019-11-29  9:22 ` [v6,3/3] arm64: dts: fsl-ls208xa-rdb: fix an errata E-00013 Biwen Li
2019-12-02 23:15 ` [v6,1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: support property idle-state Rob Herring
2019-12-03 11:11   ` [EXT] " Biwen Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191129092222.2706-2-biwen.li@nxp.com \
    --to=biwen.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).