From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F88C80D3E for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5810C2480B for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 20:40:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576269657; bh=Bn/A8pPjx5b3gjcXE0xjFh46MqimhSJTtlxlrQfDMiE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=kTLi6EVuGIEQqmAS0ce3aty5JZYG1Z4mOHVTEaUG3ZvNuo0xQQlEOG34zOWZ+GAXW 1PJSeoEkMg/dooEd11rC68SSTtXwAmSP+O5QfzSh2kYTbinmQnLySAslRc6wgltdFo Jg2Moih4YfbKGoBpiW09J0/KOPKzUDLN5wYbFscs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728919AbfLMTKp (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:10:45 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]:43206 "EHLO mail-ot1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728455AbfLMTKp (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:10:45 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id p8so292304oth.10; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:10:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qHsUIESi47GUujK3ymDIbUW6G62I8FASealFyFb2qxM=; b=AcjW8tUdCv9JovElKmJf/3USBllUi8LdD3OGKxsR7zfxZtN4daJW5oW8GXsCBAiScR pfuQ/1djnhlMR5Jjwl+hdUZ4N8/Fh7g5jEGZqKy8G1/FDDtLYsypqunIMPoOMLg0k04I dVg2R5cSApJR5MhutHIiyIN47axT6o43HhU8fetu7K9CZPKeyRod4W2on6PLXBB8SAX0 ir7rMlF8/lM0NtIC7y/VW3xZPASoqxkRkuUs7qRbDrMG3tK/UMBdT2V4DQavMFr+gIIs UMOVrgKMfihylRY7CE+bojRu15bQSb/+mPRmR8gQEAHaqUPBon274D60lSXDL8LINCLg 7q5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVyabQn1b3fGlXIChVt+1Bifp7eKZxI/d3IgP6XeC9FfK/gX7C+ G+EZhSe3+0gTWJEViXCYdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzHxWniZ5J9xfopYjECrU07WUzV4L9U6fU6FRGgt1nEiyBXlgj3TRlcGj+V/4Fj0x84/KDZiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:53cb:: with SMTP id i11mr16760478oth.158.1576264244638; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm3550697oie.25.2019.12.13.11.10.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:10:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:10:43 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Ming-Fan Chen Cc: Matthias Brugger , Yong Wu , Evan Green , Joerg Roedel , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, Ming-Fan Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add binding for MT6779 SMI Message-ID: <20191213191043.GB28558@bogus> References: <1575872371-671-1-git-send-email-ming-fan.chen@mediatek.com> <1575872371-671-3-git-send-email-ming-fan.chen@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1575872371-671-3-git-send-email-ming-fan.chen@mediatek.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 14:19:30 +0800, Ming-Fan Chen wrote: > This patch add description for MT6779 SMI. > > Signed-off-by: Ming-Fan Chen > --- > .../memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-common.txt | 5 +++-- > .../memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.txt | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.