devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, seansw@qti.qualcomm.com,
	daidavid1@codeaurora.org, adharmap@codeaurora.org,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	sibis@codeaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	evgreen@chromium.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Introduce Bandwidth OPPs for interconnects
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:55:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200108112522.afg535ybfxrlypcv@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191207002424.201796-1-saravanak@google.com>

On 06-12-19, 16:24, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Viresh/Stephen,
> 
> I don't think all the additional code/diff in this v6 series is worth it
> to avoid using the rate field to store peak bandwidth. However, since folks
> weren't too happy about it, here it is. I prefer the v5 series, but not
> too strongly tied to it. Let me know what you think Viresh/Stephen.
> 
> Btw, I wasn't sure of opp-hz = 0

I am not sure either ;)

> or opp-level = 0 were allowed. Also,

I think this is allowed.

> it's not clear why the duplicate check isn't done for opp-level when
> _opp_add() is called. Based on that, we could add opp-level comparison

This should be done. Please do that in the first patch as I suggested
in the code as well.

> to opp_compare_key(). That's why you'll see a few spurious
> opp_key.level = 0 lines. Let me know how you want to go with that.
> 
> I could also add a opp.key_type enum field to store what key type the
> opp entry is. But looks like I can get away without adding an
> unnecessary variable. So, I've skipped that for now.

Not in the OPP struct, but such an enum can be used for helper
routines as I commented.

-- 
viresh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-08 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-07  0:24 [PATCH v6 0/3] Introduce Bandwidth OPPs for interconnects Saravana Kannan
2019-12-07  0:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-peak-kBps and opp-avg-kBps bindings Saravana Kannan
2020-01-08 10:32   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-09  0:32     ` Saravana Kannan
2019-12-07  0:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] OPP: Add support for bandwidth OPP tables Saravana Kannan
2020-01-07 19:28   ` Sibi Sankar
2020-01-08  6:16     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-01-29 13:40       ` Sibi Sankar
2020-01-08 10:53   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-09  0:58     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-01-09  4:31       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-09 18:35         ` Saravana Kannan
2020-01-10  6:54           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-12-07  0:24 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] OPP: Add helper function " Saravana Kannan
2020-01-08 11:19   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-09  0:58     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-01-09  3:36       ` Saravana Kannan
2020-01-09  4:41         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-09  4:40       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-09 18:44         ` Saravana Kannan
2020-01-10  7:01           ` Viresh Kumar
2020-01-08 11:25 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2020-01-14 10:34 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Introduce Bandwidth OPPs for interconnects Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200108112522.afg535ybfxrlypcv@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daidavid1@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=seansw@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).