From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFA6C3524D for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF6E2087E for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="P3ZrHiZJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726325AbgBCUEr (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2020 15:04:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:39742 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726834AbgBCUEr (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2020 15:04:47 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 84so8114724pfy.6 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 12:04:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QjkulTeybGn9hNr5RiBCHxoPg8v6iMLSI5yxep0HG28=; b=P3ZrHiZJfNNMAoSNpfqY0kRzBLBThgv6uhIlB0hQnndEa8t4ACeotN76+b92LOyAR1 /AHTa0vrCdE936p8ODrCDeKIbImfC5Y3nIfpqYVyhF+ME6XxIWACUy+MVd2nb50JnKmC btOtt92Dso9wsr0VBbaSqkpCsYFhVmmKv8HY8yfGOKeSyFk3sjsuPnDDAsDdmIKl9hcv TDBgcvO09BtD+D3AsjhB/K7X3lo40cs7TLmyTKtscF4WfwQzE2pG++6iNIWdA9cJmxOi fFejvfq/sedP1cHmT19AgmFUudrvBpGoQwk9ziMIEKhRAK+K5Zg7cWypjXTXEdwkvD29 6jHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QjkulTeybGn9hNr5RiBCHxoPg8v6iMLSI5yxep0HG28=; b=fLw+QPgkBW4tHZwFqHCsgNBBGCGallkDHSn9eY1R972g4T+b5vFKJ/KNUbgDeiNQfG MKYHOXEAV8/Yp6Mzs7SdfDocDelJ8ps4W+JUfZQur5G8lL9IJLZeAEcwwV8FpVdqWOS2 T9NwGLTnZxaHfRx4HgEjtVKMhdAaXexnKbvv8JKE+/pZ5JgaJF8hGTpR91YWNTSG/8G6 Xgjt+PGzCXCg4dfc7R7LuRGUBHXrOqCuVkRF0jLltt/nyV2MHVt9VzPqgyLGMTnzwWc3 l5gwTOZIbFgsloVvvho5sf9P+hO0QrLZpXLpXcN+ZlAN3dAjZ5NfQrTbOre0zw68+ton /Jig== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVjjg6RC3OUf8/Udm+xHjNZkhofOA2neeJdLFOezTQV2LkMZDT1 K5bYpH1Dlzub8gAEBEdxllHC9A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxSX3IT/Y4QU0IY3LL1ZOt6lUaeo4Pou0WcpI4oIESu5GLix0UbJ3MWDPLyKtppw2IV0Fskdw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:1a16:: with SMTP id a22mr26237902pfa.34.1580760286486; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 12:04:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from builder (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s14sm5229407pgv.74.2020.02.03.12.04.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Feb 2020 12:04:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:04:43 -0800 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Doug Anderson Cc: Stephen Boyd , Andy Gross , Rob Herring , Jeffrey Hugo , Taniya Das , Jeffrey Hugo , linux-arm-msm , Harigovindan P , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Matthias Kaehlcke , Kalyan Thota , Mark Rutland , linux-clk , "Kristian H. Kristensen" , Michael Turquette , LKML , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] clk: qcom: Fix parenting for dispcc/gpucc/videocc Message-ID: <20200203200443.GN3948@builder> References: <20200203183149.73842-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20200203193027.62BD22080D@mail.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon 03 Feb 11:41 PST 2020, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:30 AM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-02-03 10:31:33) > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml | 72 -------------- > > > ...om,dispcc.yaml => qcom,msm8998-gpucc.yaml} | 33 +++---- > > > .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-dispcc.yaml | 84 ++++++++++++++++ > > > .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-gpucc.yaml | 72 ++++++++++++++ > > > .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-videocc.yaml | 63 ++++++++++++ > > > .../bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-dispcc.yaml | 99 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > .../bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-gpucc.yaml | 72 ++++++++++++++ > > > ...,videocc.yaml => qcom,sdm845-videocc.yaml} | 27 ++--- > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 47 +++++++++ > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 28 +++++- > > > > I don't want to take patches touching dts/qcom/. These aren't necessary > > to merge right now, correct? Or at least, they can go via arm-soc tree? > > Right. They can go later. > > Specifically for sdm845 until the sdm845 patches lands the old dts > trees will yell about the missing clocks, but it's not like they will > compile fail. Also the bindings themselves will validate fine. > There's no other way forward, though, and the old bindings caused > similar yells. > Can you please help me parse this, will old DT cause complaints or will it fail to boot? > For sc7180 there's no usage of any of these clocks and this adds the > first usage, so definitely no problem there. > > Once you've landed then Bjorn or Andy can pick up the dts. > Do I need to apply these after Stephen picks the driver patches? Or are they simply nop until the driver patches lands? Regards, Bjorn