From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA55C3F2D0 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02322253D for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:41:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583865676; bh=Ck3Z2DUi4J7kJJL1GeyA323OUte/zlDqXJuhcZsgVjU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=HFTuQjcj9t2sYxkaM3GaDfwxHxeMzU5w9nSX49f/4xiQvfOAWovmHSo0TsK7t6zir Dnnk8ybMVWAbU1HXgtuyYgo6vkHRNKtJSgb8KXQPn3gjxOGYhJ08/f4KXPRMHwsYEn fHU0jQXNG5cjkxqe6K5ytyZ78eB3AJpjWvQ+zQJM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726917AbgCJSlM (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:41:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:43358 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726283AbgCJSlL (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:41:11 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id a6so6288993otb.10; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:41:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Yilc9mhdFZvcfQin0GJ0eQvRcufzr/Dm7B4thkkaYHw=; b=FQeA8OBm7XuNoqtbmUQRPmLvDo7VOfvlDpUdgpCZwXfcXQqCwsV5sTOKIMVHcSJaoM bSefGwKzEN8c/lIWkazxMlDqWZPLX+2MXHPCl6p6ZGnIyVFUpLSeWQHGIFkmWeJGcamC GNBfPYYRw/BCkU/7MukVskqfxFeJSGSQ7EiV8wYrl3W/9WTIbyJM62Ep1cVECAA3dHuo zaXUZTvzL1XU2+36F+v9x9vuJSY/QB8ie5E4R39CUInG8PZeajSSR4G+GFhPp4QD6YHg Eg+WlAnyH2vtLQJzliLhu2jvNpk43y4QoaO4iUhKZt1ZWsSoS2/w29dA1nlXR2LezVcw O1Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3QLa27OOL2siRzLZ94LfUMfxGfAdcXYbXYfVpCKt3nq4vZTspO vmBbrpuhEQTVvz0u4oNHNw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs/2TypjqEMN/AlYKRD1w+166WI1z9sKyXsLQjXpYLMyf6JNW7TSM5mm39EtFmpUM3Gntw1rA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1b68:: with SMTP id d8mr17520762ote.56.1583865670711; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rob-hp-laptop (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s22sm5984280otr.57.2020.03.10.11.41.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2632 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:41:09 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:41:09 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Ansuel Smith Cc: sboyd@kernel.org, Ansuel Smith , John Crispin , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Michael Turquette , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qcom: clk-rpm: add missing rpm clk for ipq806x Message-ID: <20200310184109.GA2508@bogus> References: <20200310143756.244-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200310143756.244-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:37:56 +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote: > Add missing definition of rpm clk for ipq806x soc > > Signed-off-by: John Crispin > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith > Acked-by: John Crispin > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt | 1 + > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++ > include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h | 4 +++ > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+) > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.