Re: [PATCH v6 03/14] ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Change get_sr() and get_wss() to be more explicit

From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: "Clément Péron" <peron.clem@gmail.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Marcus Cooper <codekipper@gmail.com>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/14] ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Change get_sr() and get_wss() to be more explicit
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:14:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201005121419.mum4g5utdesvyg7a@gilmour.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201003141950.455829-4-peron.clem@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2525 bytes --]

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> We are actually using a complex formula to just return a bunch of
> simple values. Also this formula is wrong for sun4i when calling
> get_wss() the function return 4 instead of 3.
> 
> Replace this with a simpler switch case.
> 
> Also drop the i2s params which is unused and return a simple int as
> returning an error code could be out of range for an s8 and there is
> no optim to return a s8 here.
> 
> Fixes: 619c15f7fac9 ("ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Change SR and WSS computation")
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> index 1f577dbc20a6..8e497fb3de09 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ struct sun4i_i2s_quirks {
>  	unsigned int			num_mclk_dividers;
>  
>  	unsigned long (*get_bclk_parent_rate)(const struct sun4i_i2s *);
> -	s8	(*get_sr)(const struct sun4i_i2s *, int);
> -	s8	(*get_wss)(const struct sun4i_i2s *, int);
> +	int	(*get_sr)(unsigned int width);
> +	int	(*get_wss)(unsigned int width);
>  	int	(*set_chan_cfg)(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s,
>  				unsigned int channels,	unsigned int slots,
>  				unsigned int slot_width);
> @@ -381,37 +381,56 @@ static int sun4i_i2s_set_clk_rate(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static s8 sun4i_i2s_get_sr(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s, int width)
> +static int sun4i_i2s_get_sr(unsigned int width)
>  {
> -	if (width < 16 || width > 24)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	if (width % 4)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	switch (width) {
> +	case 16:
> +		return 0x0;
> +	case 20:
> +		return 0x1;
> +	case 24:
> +		return 0x2;
> +	}
>  
> -	return (width - 16) / 4;
> +	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> -static s8 sun4i_i2s_get_wss(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s, int width)
> +static int sun4i_i2s_get_wss(unsigned int width)
>  {
> -	if (width < 16 || width > 32)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	if (width % 4)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	switch (width) {
> +	case 16:
> +		return 0x0;
> +	case 20:
> +		return 0x1;
> +	case 24:
> +		return 0x2;
> +	case 32:
> +		return 0x3;
> +	}

Like I said in the previous version, I'm not really sure why we need to
use the hexadecimal representation here?

Maxime

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]