From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8FDC07E95 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BDC6128E for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 02:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237397AbhGNCWT (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 22:22:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36290 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237554AbhGNCWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 22:22:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C2BC0613E9 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id u14so628900pga.11 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YUWPTzB4dLR17/T5lZ7IYCIE7LvDfGsZbPME2WfdaEQ=; b=Skmc4/PTwW2vYOAvkxNEp/sYehALwIe3vbYmis9pp8B8s8+wKbwKLLkS2x6Uw0hnu3 0svGx8KcIUZK3SigWkrI1LBoqGu1Gr/zfFuUkQYY1z+GkIQJyZmhGqeDKIrbtkGJkA9/ pV4SFmb6Em4EJHyfkvu52ERl3YZgKA2kl4gFPSlJlROoiehQQIfHPqiC99fxTZvdJuLd EiLrpiwCuiSYVnmy8yfgjiy36rHG6vuajRXQqWXRpeItlXDPp/KYqloeAmd8U0ejyp7Z +rOKfLdJcEVKX2jUAiZJFb1dHgMx8bLQzO3xc3+iNg0jTqpv8EwU3a8X/RGDZ9tV/fe8 53JQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YUWPTzB4dLR17/T5lZ7IYCIE7LvDfGsZbPME2WfdaEQ=; b=TaRHR0zrRrVy0eGO5AMbWg4rSg3BpgdVLtahRcN6E6+gM4Xio+NuIOWaIFZP5KtG11 6qKkCyDWUuM/ZyqOF1Y2RJj+/DJeRu5fqQhfS50FQRtvYUO8NpkaV3damgIOHlAkOCTP xs9JY19Hm4RMU/Q8VOGrIEMT79f4xbdE0XhpNm4RZ/+stokoSUQ7YnhE48D2dBPsU6Rs EzVq6dw87WFMQoBlC+8KGZ571DVdFSsihTvQD+2uOTFE0ZOVf3n9yxC/0itZ0CdE8vZG Yl/Z67jFbXcHjOh7f8i7J3AkM6jKCX8cE9jY8V1PvZ4+l5fC2InYCSOK0iH1jiuur9A5 ik8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vLnbIVFV4TG6R9XQnVGcPlvA5RBiuLv6ioLFjsmGAmlKkiCRi ZD8J9o3IAbUQ39mbMc/gCNDNSA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLOPLEDHG4baKqARncau1utGS0ltDshGrrtQ4HLM6pZ8LZIXvVGdAGINqm7KHcuA2FTBkJpw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6e09:: with SMTP id j9mr6980452pgc.275.1626229167125; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([106.201.108.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm437140pjq.27.2021.07.13.19.19.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:49:24 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Rob Herring Cc: Jason Wang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Arnd Bergmann , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Vincent Guittot , Bill Mills , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , Jie Deng , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR QEMU'S CIRRUS DEVICE" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: virtio: mmio: Add support for device subnode Message-ID: <20210714021924.uob5wrasipzhbyrj@vireshk-i7> References: <20210713151917.zouwfckidnjxvohn@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 13-07-21, 13:34, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > We already do this for linux-event-codes.h and so I thought it is the > > right way of doing it :) > > Humm, maybe it's okay. Please double check then... > > > Else we can create a new copy, which will be a mess, or use hardcoded > > values. > > Though you may not need the header based on what Arnd and I have suggested. Yeah, we may not need it at all. New node or not, reg property will get converted to a compatible anyway.. Thanks. -- viresh