On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/02/2022 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 08:40, Uwe Kleine-König
> > <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> [dropped Anson Huang and Yash Shah from Cc: which were not reachable for
> >> my last mail]
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v1:
> >>> 1. Add tags.
> >>> 2. Adjust subject (Uwe).
> >>
> >> However you only took a part of my suggestion ...
> >>
> >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (15):
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: intel,lgm: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: iqs620a: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: mxs: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: sifive: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,pwm: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: toshiba,visconti: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >>>   dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >>
> >> ... The actual patch has a space after the comma, I like this variant
> >> without comma better as this is a compatible string.
> > 
> > I am confused. My patch does not have comma after space. Your reply
> > had such in the subject, but not in the proposed new subject you wrote
> > in msg, so I left it as is. Without comma. If you still see comma, it
> > is something with your mail client.
> > 
> > See:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214212154.8853-12-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/T/#u
> > 
> > Also reply from Vijayakannan does not have comma:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214081605.161394-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/T/#m80af695f2c751341bc971114aefa00ccc929a3ec

Strange: I have this mail four times in my mailboxes (via
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm, kernel@pengutronix.de and directly). In the
two latter the Subject line is broken in two:

	Subject: [PATCH v2 08/15] dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,
	 pwm: Include generic pwm schema

So this is indeed a problem near my side.

> Just one more clarification - you proposed also to remove "pwm:"
> middle-prefix. Shall I remove it from every patch and use instead full
> file name?

I did that to save some vertical space in the Subject line. I don't feel
strong here.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |