On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:41:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/02/2022 11:49, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 15/02/2022 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 08:40, Uwe Kleine-König
> >>>> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [dropped Anson Huang and Yash Shah from Cc: which were not reachable for
> >>>>> my last mail]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Changes since v1:
> >>>>>> 1. Add tags.
> >>>>>> 2. Adjust subject (Uwe).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However you only took a part of my suggestion ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (15):
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: intel,lgm: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: iqs620a: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: mxs: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: sifive: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: renesas,pwm: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: toshiba,visconti: Include generic pwm schema
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: brcm,bcm7038: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >>>>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ... The actual patch has a space after the comma, I like this variant
> >>>>> without comma better as this is a compatible string.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am confused. My patch does not have comma after space. Your reply
> >>>> had such in the subject, but not in the proposed new subject you wrote
> >>>> in msg, so I left it as is. Without comma. If you still see comma, it
> >>>> is something with your mail client.
> >>>>
> >>>> See:
> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214212154.8853-12-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/T/#u
> >>>>
> >>>> Also reply from Vijayakannan does not have comma:
> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220214081605.161394-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/T/#m80af695f2c751341bc971114aefa00ccc929a3ec
> >>
> >> Strange: I have this mail four times in my mailboxes (via
> >> linux-arm-kernel, linux-pwm, kernel@pengutronix.de and directly). In the
> >> two latter the Subject line is broken in two:
> > 
> > I was wrong. The ones to kernel@pengutronix.de and the linux-arm-kernel
> > one are the ones with the linebreak.
> > 
> > Hmm,
> > 
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717310.html
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/717304.html
> > 
> > has the linebreaks, too. Still I wonder what is different between
> > kernel@pengutronix.de and u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de.
> 
> Other threads - not only mine - are also affected:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714311.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714316.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2022-February/714364.html

In the meantime I'm confident that mailman2 is the culprit.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |