From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 08:54:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220526135404.GA3831942-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220526054642.zw44mgw2bd2u5v76@ti.com>
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:16:42AM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 25/05/22 04:00PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > SPI bus per device properties must be defined in spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> > for unevaluatedProperties checks to work correctly on device nodes.
> >
> > This has the side effect of promoting 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to be a
> > common property, but functionally it's no different if it was defined in
> > a Synopsys specific schema file.
>
> Functionally it is no different, but does this property make sense for
> other controllers? If not then I don't see why we should pollute the
> common list with controller-specific ones. For one, this now no longer
> makes it obvious that this property should only be used with the
> Synopsys controller. And if you keep making small exceptions for other
> controllers too, soon the common list will be full of controller
> properties and it will be a mess finding out what belongs to who.
There's at least one other case already:
cdns,read-delay:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
description:
Delay for read capture logic, in clock cycles.
Too many common properties is not a problem we have. Too many custom
properties doing the same thing is the problem.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-26 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 21:00 [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: Move 'rx-sample-delay-ns' to spi-peripheral-props.yaml Rob Herring
2022-05-26 5:46 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-05-26 13:54 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-05-27 11:32 ` Serge Semin
2022-05-31 15:10 ` Rob Herring
2022-06-01 5:29 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-06-07 10:46 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220526135404.GA3831942-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).