devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
	ssantosh@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: tony@atomide.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: add support for denying idle for reset clockdomain
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:51:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34c761e7-65c1-cc42-2b33-513dfbcd8574@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81cda31a-b321-f9b4-2df7-2b6c084b2ec5@ti.com>

On 20.8.2019 2.16, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Tero,
> 
> On 8/7/19 2:48 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> TI SoCs hardware reset signals require the parent clockdomain to be
>> in force wakeup mode while de-asserting the reset, otherwise it may
>> never complete. To support this, add pdata hooks to control the
>> clockdomain directly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c            | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   include/linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c b/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
>> index d412af3..870515e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>>   
>> +#include <linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h>
>> +
>>   struct omap_rst_map {
>>   	s8 rst;
>>   	s8 st;
>> @@ -24,6 +26,7 @@ struct omap_rst_map {
>>   struct omap_prm_data {
>>   	u32 base;
>>   	const char *name;
>> +	const char *clkdm_name;
>>   	u16 pwstctrl;
>>   	u16 pwstst;
>>   	u16 rstctl;
>> @@ -40,6 +43,8 @@ struct omap_prm {
>>   struct omap_reset_data {
>>   	struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
>>   	struct omap_prm *prm;
>> +	struct clockdomain *clkdm;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>>   };
>>   
>>   #define to_omap_reset_data(p) container_of((p), struct omap_reset_data, rcdev)
>> @@ -108,6 +113,8 @@ static int omap_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>>   	int st_bit = id;
>>   	bool has_rstst;
>>   	int timeout = 0;
>> +	struct ti_prm_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(reset->dev);
>> +	int ret = 0;
>>   
>>   	/* check the current status to avoid de-asserting the line twice */
>>   	v = readl_relaxed(reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctl);
>> @@ -125,13 +132,16 @@ static int omap_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>>   		writel_relaxed(v, reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstst);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (pdata->clkdm_deny_idle && reset->clkdm)
>> +		pdata->clkdm_deny_idle(reset->clkdm);
>> +
>>   	/* de-assert the reset control line */
>>   	v = readl_relaxed(reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctl);
>>   	v &= ~(1 << id);
>>   	writel_relaxed(v, reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctl);
>>   
>>   	if (!has_rstst)
>> -		return 0;
>> +		goto exit;
>>   
>>   	/* wait for the status to be set */
>>   	while (1) {
>> @@ -140,13 +150,19 @@ static int omap_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>>   		if (v)
>>   			break;
>>   		timeout++;
>> -		if (timeout > OMAP_RESET_MAX_WAIT)
>> -			return -EBUSY;
>> +		if (timeout > OMAP_RESET_MAX_WAIT) {
>> +			ret = -EBUSY;
>> +			goto exit;
>> +		}
>>   
>>   		udelay(1);
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	return 0;
>> +exit:
>> +	if (pdata->clkdm_allow_idle && reset->clkdm)
>> +		pdata->clkdm_allow_idle(reset->clkdm);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static const struct reset_control_ops omap_reset_ops = {
>> @@ -159,6 +175,8 @@ static int omap_prm_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>   				struct omap_prm *prm)
>>   {
>>   	struct omap_reset_data *reset;
>> +	struct ti_prm_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> 
> Please add checks for NULL callbacks. I don't think these are optional
> right, so better to check in init rather than during runtime. Granted
> you will probably not run into this after patch 8, but would be good to
> check and print an error in case pdata quirks is missed out.

Hmm ok, this would get rid of the runtime checks which would be slightly 
cleaner.

> 
>> +	char buf[32];
>>   
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Check if we have resets. If either rstctl or rstst is
>> @@ -177,9 +195,15 @@ static int omap_prm_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>   	reset->rcdev.ops = &omap_reset_ops;
>>   	reset->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>   	reset->rcdev.nr_resets = OMAP_MAX_RESETS;
>> +	reset->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>   
>>   	reset->prm = prm;
>>   
>> +	sprintf(buf, "%s_clkdm", prm->data->clkdm_name ? prm->data->clkdm_name :
>> +		prm->data->name);
>> +
>> +	reset->clkdm = pdata->clkdm_lookup(buf);
> 
> Not checking return status?

clkdm will just end up being NULL in failure, which is fine for rest of 
the code. I don't think it can be ever NULL though, so I can add a check 
here for sanity.

-Tero

> 
> regards
> Suman
> 
>> +
>>   	return devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &reset->rcdev);
>>   }
>>   
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h b/include/linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..28154c3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * TI PRM (Power & Reset Manager) platform data
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Texas Instruments, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _LINUX_PLATFORM_DATA_TI_PRM_H
>> +#define _LINUX_PLATFORM_DATA_TI_PRM_H
>> +
>> +struct clockdomain;
>> +
>> +struct ti_prm_platform_data {
>> +	void (*clkdm_deny_idle)(struct clockdomain *clkdm);
>> +	void (*clkdm_allow_idle)(struct clockdomain *clkdm);
>> +	struct clockdomain * (*clkdm_lookup)(const char *name);
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif /* _LINUX_PLATFORM_DATA_TI_PRM_H */
>>
> 

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-20  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-07  7:48 [PATCH 0/8] soc: ti: Add OMAP PRM driver Tero Kristo
2019-08-07  7:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: omap: add new binding for PRM instances Tero Kristo
2019-08-08  4:35   ` Keerthy
2019-08-19  9:28     ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 21:28       ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20  7:45         ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07  7:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] soc: ti: add initial PRM driver with reset control support Tero Kristo
2019-08-08  5:26   ` Keerthy
2019-08-19  9:32     ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:01       ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20  7:37         ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-20 16:47           ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21 15:10             ` Philipp Zabel
2019-08-21 15:45               ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21 18:15                 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-23  8:50                   ` Philipp Zabel
2019-08-23 11:27                     ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07  7:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: poll for reset complete during de-assert Tero Kristo
2019-08-07  7:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: add support for denying idle for reset clockdomain Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:16   ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20  7:51     ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2019-08-07  7:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: add omap4 PRM data Tero Kristo
2019-08-08  5:30   ` Keerthy
2019-08-19  9:32     ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:08   ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20  7:52     ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-20 17:23       ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21  6:38         ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07  7:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] soc: ti: omap_prm: add data for am33xx Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:11   ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20 18:48   ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21  7:23     ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-21 15:49       ` Suman Anna
2019-08-07  7:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: add dra7 PRM data Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:12   ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20 19:03   ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21  7:36     ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07  7:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: OMAP2+: pdata-quirks: add PRM data for reset support Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:20 ` [PATCH 0/8] soc: ti: Add OMAP PRM driver Suman Anna
2019-08-20  7:54   ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-20 16:51     ` Suman Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34c761e7-65c1-cc42-2b33-513dfbcd8574@ti.com \
    --to=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).