From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:20:00 +0100 Message-ID: <56E6E4B0.8060408@st.com> References: <1457294038-14243-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <56DD8FBE.9010200@suse.de> <56DD99A4.5030004@st.com> <56DDA26C.3050301@suse.de> <56DDA3D5.3090209@st.com> <56DDB749.1020808@suse.de> <56DE7E1D.5070508@st.com> <56DFE55B.2090806@st.com> <56DFE64B.8060606@st.com> <56DFF253.9050208@st.com> <56DFFA9E.7060602@st.com> <56E033C8.40506@st.com> <56E038CE.606@st.com> <56E13AAB.2080900@st.com> <56E28B5D.6000708@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+glpar-linux-rockchip=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Tomeu Vizoso Cc: "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Dinh Nguyen , =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, LKML , =?UTF-8?B?RnJhbmsgU2Now6RmZXI=?= , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Gabriel Fernandez , Fabrice GASNIER , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , LAKML , Alexandre TORGUE List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Tomeu On 3/14/2016 12:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi Peppe, > > with that patch I don't see any difference at all in my setup. > > So to be clear, with these commits on top of next-20160314, I still > get the hang during boot: > > 209afef6f0cd ARM: dts: rockchip: Add mdio node to ethernet node > 2315acc6cf7f Revert "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit routine" > b5e08e810c63 stmmac: fix tx prepare for normal desc > 37c15a31d850 i2c: immediately mark ourselves as registered > 4342eec3c5a2 Add linux-next specific files for 20160314 > > [ 27.521026] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:303 > dev_watchdog+0x284/0x288 > [ 27.529460] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (rk_gmac-dwmac): transmit queue 0 timed out I do not reproduce the WATCHDOG but i am continuing to look at the code to understand if normal descriptor management is ok or not. I keep you informed. Just an info, did you test with 2315acc6cf7f included? Just to understand if it is introducing a problem. It works in case of enhanced descriptors are used instead of. > > https://git.collabora.com/cgit/user/tomeu/linux.git/log/?h=broken-eth-on-rock2 thx I will take a look at this Regards Peppe