From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC37C43141 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 19:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C422073A for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 19:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="UtGcVOPw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726632AbfKOTia (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:38:30 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:40791 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726466AbfKOTia (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:38:30 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id r4so7152195pfl.7 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:38:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:cc:to:subject:from:user-agent:date; bh=N3RglndAty+Q/Su9LZ87Avtb9ayjrGHyeAiCuksi9yI=; b=UtGcVOPwv+Sz7IoEtQf5f6u5Bwgm0baqY2Pm/LkCq5Y+myds1WEgPKSc/h4IFVnGfM 4cJdrIwH0moWO54hBHgBqhBcFoRIB5Gi6eNmpMXxG108ONJdy3ibW5lS+7A3vvNUpUPU hnztaqL+IFnT/g0h1yPCraXD14WhOHqnkPB8Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:subject:from :user-agent:date; bh=N3RglndAty+Q/Su9LZ87Avtb9ayjrGHyeAiCuksi9yI=; b=MwsHoE2coe4y+DovgX6n2nJ9chQH23w2H+PtADhqf0Fsl4ojPm4Gr2sWG8I8QR8I7c sbsv8/MWctR6gvlfkSG/S/a09NAZT2Gnxn1ZlCKxiIDuJ1n/FITMORkC/3FaAyUadDMY cZQbzot8wKULin1DCWiff/RILviYl8guPYDRZVs5wFpg/VXz97n9ZfNRXQbfXcpMwh/x nlx3pR1nK7qTcYsWinOqU4cY5cpXozMYB8EaAfkDNRm8RI28kv8KAg+c6JIKeZyr82kB iQv76OqfRXToapsT1U8T5wZYk8lECnXMfr7ZP/pTPCYj5Q42EQgw2E/ck6zWE2wjzsaK GeHg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVY/4yBk5kWhbIxt3xd6tIKV+SxkV1rf0H/j14IBD7KMMuU+j/k 53gwTkG0S3EMaxVOATEOSHN/wA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIIQmbO8Jh5LsYVJAkG9qSWUVFtjTBJtmPW9PBcFmGXEA3YzAVQ7//IHl8Rf9YfaPCT7oA/A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:395:: with SMTP id 143mr12694732pgd.93.1573846709916; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from chromium.org ([2620:15c:202:1:fa53:7765:582b:82b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 82sm11338835pfa.115.2019.11.15.11.38.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:38:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5dcefeb5.1c69fb81.757a7.0d4f@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <83394ae827ce7c123228b749bcae2a2c470e88a4.1573814758.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> References: <83394ae827ce7c123228b749bcae2a2c470e88a4.1573814758.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rajendra Nayak , Rishabh Bhatnagar , Doug Anderson , Sai Prakash Ranjan To: Andy Gross , Rob Herring , Sai Prakash Ranjan , bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: msm: Rename cache-controller to system-cache-controller From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:38:28 -0800 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2019-11-15 02:59:11) > DT schema checks for the node name 'cache-controller' and enforces > that there has to be a cache-level associated with it. But LLCC is > a system cache and does not have a cache-level property and hence > the dt binding check fails. So let us rename the LLCC cache-controller > to system-cache-controller which is the proper description and also > makes the schema happy. >=20 > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd > Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd