From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Ingenic JZ47xx Timer/Counter Unit drivers Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:10:22 +0200 Message-ID: <6a0ac21b-1dbc-9821-0951-fe5e9ac34bd3@linaro.org> References: <20180110224838.16711-2-paul@crapouillou.net> <20180317232901.14129-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <2fb3344b4034385ed89bcdf7da2347d4@crapouillou.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2fb3344b4034385ed89bcdf7da2347d4@crapouillou.net> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Cercueil Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Lee Jones , Ralf Baechle , Rob Herring , Jonathan Corbet , Mark Rutland , James Hogan , Maarten ter Huurne , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 28/03/2018 17:01, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Le 2018-03-18 23:13, Daniel Lezcano a écrit : >> On 18/03/2018 00:28, Paul Cercueil wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is the 4th version of my TCU patchset. >>> >>> The major change is a greatly improved documentation, both in-code >>> and as separate text files, to describe how the hardware works and >>> how the devicetree bindings should be used. >>> >>> There are also cosmetic changes in the irqchip driver, and the >>> clocksource driver will now use as timers all TCU channels not >>> requested by the TCU PWM driver. >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I don't know why but you series appears in reply to [PATCH v3 2/9]. Not >> sure if it is my mailer or how you are sending the patches but if it is >> the latter can you in the future, when resending a new version, not use >> the in-reply-to option. It will be easier to follow the versions. >> >> Thanks. >> >>  -- Daniel > > Hi Daniel, > > I guess I did a mistake. I always reply to the first patch of the previous > version of the patchset (is that correct?). It depends, if you have a threaded view of emails, it is not easy to review the patches when they are in several levels. Usually you can see the patches is top posted without in-reply-to every version. You can use in-reply-to to an email suggesting a change in order to give context. For the v4 series of these drivers, I'm lost :/ -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog