From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:37:10 +0000 Message-ID: <83f46f73-baa7-c3d5-86f0-cf0af05ab359@arm.com> References: <20180212183352.22730-1-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> <20180212183352.22730-4-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> <27a044ee-0ed7-0470-0fef-289d0d5cf5e8@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <27a044ee-0ed7-0470-0fef-289d0d5cf5e8-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Sinan Kaya , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org" , "kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" Cc: Mark Rutland , "ilias.apalodimas-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , Catalin Marinas , "xuzaibo-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , Will Deacon , "ashok.raj-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "bharatku-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "rfranz-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org" , "rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org" , Sudeep Holla , "christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/03/18 15:28, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/12/2018 1:33 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >> +static void io_mm_free(struct io_mm *io_mm) >> +{ >> + struct mm_struct *mm; >> + void (*release)(struct io_mm *); >> + >> + release = io_mm->release; >> + mm = io_mm->mm; >> + >> + release(io_mm); > > Is there any reason why you can't call iommu->release() > here directly? Why do you need the release local variable? I think I can remove the local variable Thanks, Jean