From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52FCC43334 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234841AbiGLTnD (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:43:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50760 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233872AbiGLTml (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:42:41 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157BCD7BAD; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADBD661920; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11807C3411C; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:21:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657653690; bh=M4nOiHls/X4CoLYgXRHW0yLj98EdXQu40ZVYcAk9ddQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Rd0n+WY5MeMbnArlbcuUNWO8W3JloHwCphO9ATvU9Utmx05wKC05ZracbHKU32dH2 aWhQT+o/d512Hxfohoju3NgmVG0jNIfppwPLkxuZxAG7cJQ6FdLC56opiuK1S0O2fc Mjw55r8e/9hzMpMssHX9dlorlnfEcV46GPpl5ff4CLt5hhvs65Su23Ai3BPO/50E4g Cm0FWw92U7rtmFxEZHLJ6wRMhpobJdIiQsW/REeEIdaXE2C3BQIJZqwd4o3rXXtAiV NS2fL+evEwfPoJsSPuWkV4ULH1DB4vLVPQEcB4xckWHHjt0WPxkiIxkUNO+J6c0xPa waSJWKhEBvluA== Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oBLRn-00735w-OR; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:21:27 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 20:21:27 +0100 Message-ID: <878roy16iw.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Rob Herring Cc: "Lad, Prabhakar" , Lad Prabhakar , Thomas Gleixner , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Sagar Kadam , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-riscv , Geert Uytterhoeven , LKML , Linux-Renesas , Phil Edworthy , Biju Das Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: sifive,plic: Document Renesas RZ/Five SoC In-Reply-To: <20220712181916.GI1823936-robh@kernel.org> References: <20220524172214.5104-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20220524172214.5104-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20220605142333.GA3439339-robh@kernel.org> <20220706215827.GA572635-robh@kernel.org> <87a69lmesa.wl-maz@kernel.org> <20220712181916.GI1823936-robh@kernel.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: robh@kernel.org, prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com, prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com, tglx@linutronix.de, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, sagar.kadam@sifive.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, geert+renesas@glider.be, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, phil.edworthy@renesas.com, biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:19:16 +0100, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:51:33AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > Can you please have a look at the latest instance[1][2] of this > > series, as posted by Samuel? I've provisionally queued it, but only on > > the provision that you would eventually ack these patches. > > I did already[1]. They passed checks, were already in linux-next, and I > didn't see anything major needing comments, so I marked it N/A (meaning > someone else applies it) without comment. > > Rob > > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20220630100241.35233-2-samuel@sholland.org/ How are people supposed to track this if it doesn't appear on the ML? That's not really an ack, AFAICT. That's a "I don't care". Does it mean I'm free to take any random DT patch unless you or a bot shouts? I'd rather know. M. (puzzled) -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.