devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:57:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5DS0p8iyqfFuHQWnpX+WGd1bUEdFMHF_1inKMuSY_j_zA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116025637.3524-5-bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:56 AM Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
> are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
> in order to meet low power request.
>
> We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/i2c.h         |  3 ++
>  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
>

Hi Bibby,

Please see my comments inline.

Hi Wolfram,

Would you have some time to take a look and comment on the general
approach? Thanks.

> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 9333c865d4a9..9b9e96b094ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
>  static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct i2c_client       *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter      *adap = client->adapter;
>         struct i2c_driver       *driver;
>         int status;
>
> @@ -371,6 +372,12 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>
>         dev_dbg(dev, "probe\n");
>
> +       status = regulator_enable(adap->bus_reg);
> +       if (status != 0) {
> +               dev_err(&adap->dev, "Failed to enable power regulator\n");
> +               goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
> +       }
> +
>         status = of_clk_set_defaults(dev->of_node, false);
>         if (status < 0)
>                 goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
> @@ -407,6 +414,7 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>  static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct i2c_client       *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter      *adap = client->adapter;
>         struct i2c_driver       *driver;
>         int status = 0;
>
> @@ -420,6 +428,8 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>         }
>
>         dev_pm_domain_detach(&client->dev, true);
> +       if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&adap->dev))

Why adap->dev? We control the regulator in bus-level runtime PM
callbacks of the client->dev, right?

> +               regulator_disable(adap->bus_reg);
>
>         dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&client->dev);
>         device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, false);
> @@ -431,6 +441,71 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>         return status;
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(&adap->dev)) {

Ditto.

> +               err = regulator_enable(adap->bus_reg);
> +               if (err)
> +                       return err;
> +       }
> +
> +       return pm_generic_resume(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&adap->dev)) {

Ditto.

> +               err = regulator_disable(adap->bus_reg);
> +               if (err)
> +                       return err;
> +       }
> +
> +       return pm_generic_suspend(dev);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       err = regulator_enable(adap->bus_reg);
> +       if (err)
> +               return err;
> +
> +       return pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       err = pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev);
> +       if (err)
> +               return err;
> +
> +       return regulator_disable(adap->bus_reg);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_device_pm = {
> +       SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(i2c_suspend, i2c_resume)
> +       SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(i2c_runtime_suspend, i2c_runtime_resume, NULL)
> +};
> +
>  static void i2c_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> @@ -488,6 +563,7 @@ struct bus_type i2c_bus_type = {
>         .probe          = i2c_device_probe,
>         .remove         = i2c_device_remove,
>         .shutdown       = i2c_device_shutdown,
> +       .pm             = &i2c_device_pm,
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_bus_type);
>
> @@ -1351,6 +1427,11 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>                 goto out_reg;
>
>         dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "adapter [%s] registered\n", adap->name);
> +       adap->bus_reg = devm_regulator_get(&adap->dev, "bus");
> +       if (IS_ERR(adap->bus_reg)) {
> +               res = PTR_ERR(adap->bus_reg);
> +               goto out_reg;
> +       }
>
>         pm_runtime_no_callbacks(&adap->dev);
>         pm_suspend_ignore_children(&adap->dev, true);
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
> index d2f786706657..833b81a680da 100644
> --- a/include/linux/i2c.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/device.h>      /* for struct device */
>  #include <linux/sched.h>       /* for completion */
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>           /* for Host Notify IRQ */
>  #include <linux/of.h>          /* for struct device_node */
> @@ -330,6 +331,7 @@ struct i2c_client {
>         int init_irq;                   /* irq set at initialization    */
>         int irq;                        /* irq issued by device         */
>         struct list_head detected;
> +

nit: Unnecessary change.

Best regards,
Tomasz

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-28  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16  2:56 [PATCH v10 0/4] add power control in i2c and at24 Bibby Hsieh
2020-01-16  2:56 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] dt-binding: eeprom: at24: add vcc-supply property Bibby Hsieh
2020-01-23 11:56   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-01-16  2:56 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] dt-binding: i2c: add bus-supply property Bibby Hsieh
2020-01-16  2:56 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] misc: eeprom: at24: support pm_runtime control Bibby Hsieh
2020-01-23 11:56   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-01-16  2:56 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter Bibby Hsieh
2020-01-28  3:57   ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2020-01-28  6:36   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-28  7:32     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-01-28  7:31   ` Tomasz Figa
2020-02-17  9:45     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-02-21  3:22       ` Bibby Hsieh
2020-02-24 22:28         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAFQd5DS0p8iyqfFuHQWnpX+WGd1bUEdFMHF_1inKMuSY_j_zA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).