From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomeu Vizoso Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:23:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1457294038-14243-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <56DD8FBE.9010200@suse.de> <56DD99A4.5030004@st.com> <56DDA26C.3050301@suse.de> <56DDA3D5.3090209@st.com> <56DDB749.1020808@suse.de> <56DE7E1D.5070508@st.com> <56DFE55B.2090806@st.com> <56DFE64B.8060606@st.com> <56DFF253.9050208@st.com> <56DFFA9E.7060602@st.com> <56E033C8.40506@st.com> <56E038CE.606@st.com> <56E13AAB.2080900@st.com> <56E28B5D.6000708@st.com> <56E6E4B0.8060408@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56E6E4B0.8060408-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Giuseppe CAVALLARO Cc: Dinh Nguyen , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Fabrice GASNIER , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , LAKML , Gabriel Fernandez , Alexandre TORGUE , =?UTF-8?Q?Frank_Sch=C3=A4fer?= , LKML List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 14 March 2016 at 17:20, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > Hi Tomeu > > On 3/14/2016 12:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> Hi Peppe, >> >> with that patch I don't see any difference at all in my setup. >> >> So to be clear, with these commits on top of next-20160314, I still >> get the hang during boot: >> >> 209afef6f0cd ARM: dts: rockchip: Add mdio node to ethernet node >> 2315acc6cf7f Revert "stmmac: first frame prep at the end of xmit routine" >> b5e08e810c63 stmmac: fix tx prepare for normal desc >> 37c15a31d850 i2c: immediately mark ourselves as registered >> 4342eec3c5a2 Add linux-next specific files for 20160314 >> >> [ 27.521026] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:303 >> dev_watchdog+0x284/0x288 >> [ 27.529460] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (rk_gmac-dwmac): transmit queue 0 >> timed out > > > I do not reproduce the WATCHDOG but i am continuing to look at the code > to understand if normal descriptor management is ok or not. I keep you > informed. > > Just an info, did you test with 2315acc6cf7f included? Just to > understand if it is introducing a problem. It works in case of > enhanced descriptors are used instead of. > >> >> >> https://git.collabora.com/cgit/user/tomeu/linux.git/log/?h=broken-eth-on-rock2 > > > thx I will take a look at this Thanks. Btw, I have rebased on top of 4.5 this morning and I have noticed that 88f8b1bb41c6 ("stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression") got in there, so I guess we have now a bunch of boards with broken network on that release :( Regards, Tomeu > Regards > Peppe > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html