From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Stanley Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Add optional property no-scan-on-init Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 16:38:50 +1030 Message-ID: References: <20180130055116.17411-1-joel@jms.id.au> <20180130055116.17411-2-joel@jms.id.au> <20180205023654.77yq7j22ovby2ql5@rob-hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180205023654.77yq7j22ovby2ql5@rob-hp-laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree , Christopher Bostic , Jeremy Kerr , Eddie James , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:21:15PM +1030, Joel Stanley wrote: >> From: Christopher Bostic >> >> Add an optional FSI master property 'no-scan-on-init. This >> can be specified to indicate that a master should not be >> automatically scanned at init time. This is required in cases >> where a scan could interfere with another FSI master on the same >> bus. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christopher Bostic >> Acked-by: Jeremy Kerr >> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt >> index 4eaf488d4015..ab516c673a4b 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt >> @@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ addresses (link index and slave ID), and no size: >> #address-cells = <2>; >> #size-cells = <0>; >> >> +An optional boolean property can be added to indicate that a particular master >> +should not scan for connected devices at initialization time. This is >> +necessary in cases where a scan could cause arbitration issues with other >> +masters that may be present on the bus. >> + >> + no-scan-on-init; >> + > > The formatting here is a bit strange compared to most bindings, but no > point in reformatting the document to add one property. I'll keep that in mind next time we're working in this area. Thanks Rob. > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > Rob