From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDB2C2B9FB for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 10:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06856135B for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 10:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230221AbhEVKkB (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2021 06:40:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55862 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230168AbhEVKkB (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2021 06:40:01 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9431C0613ED for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 03:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id w33so25452791lfu.7 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 03:38:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YDP7cgKPnmfHekICN1ZUqXwsJ8B2vownzYJ7Goi+DeI=; b=YUouiI1hWFF6RhOFFEDsvCZKfzP0Q1WjQ1yTzd1Nwkd203W2WpW0KUq02UK4sUdedQ kPpH/9R2Q6k2oGQPU+CEKSed7RaYHMWn0moLZ9YI3w6rRSiUM2/mMP2N9rsmgA9nnCVm 1gnymfMd5kdslq+5Zkn66CnoUwok9PHgZMpg1mgkcX+5zQSobOkxrYyooXl6ojyipcBT 6+OjOW29bGwfLwgOddvQJ0NWfRr/yaeDtb96d6qxbc4JRBoeboLbkKbUw04AA6ZS9iwX G/KAWLPk72o/VDTaWt6G3nV5HDzjKW+JuVKjQf0rdJMMqxTBj+YR93IUL5XiNAg+BEfO nlYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YDP7cgKPnmfHekICN1ZUqXwsJ8B2vownzYJ7Goi+DeI=; b=Qtcv4A/1/HbUrVHjpSqXQSGh3L2jWiNGxizA1WTwB6hgTYGZTakWlk0FfncOuwJ+vg wfeBLArPoQvV68NlIWs0AVojWMfCqO0I+3k7vfDzhrrOm4lo7ZnyPe78P0T+JUYRZxDb +e5Z46A7goVw2Uhx/v2GSbTD6gFiLvZADSbMk1ZxRIeS9aHt0IlbYzXOiiW32gnHSNrG 7jtnv7Ll+jZFb9saOCfEFqHXlOqUhCXxIdz8xs/l9V6dtfWdwUySnSO774jcT1OtEQNr Odh6Eejo50LB9jr1cvPwfaqiei948bNNEfyKDf/ecNUxtt40bXY7N5fxuwlLJWbn9nDu Fd4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533etoC2zDhBMWnPZqV9VPP4SJpiCVUzQr36AmPhPBPQKpEgkquU RW0sCy8BdKz16NQCR/4ej70DIvZtGBzbshs9ZG3Omg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw32JQfF9p8nsp7bu7cLUXb+nPLcZsZnsZN7Ja4Wkr9uNgmEYkdrOBP927EgYJCjUeMJd4/1kCAoDVWQ8D4Qmo= X-Received: by 2002:a19:b0b:: with SMTP id 11mr4973996lfl.291.1621679913318; Sat, 22 May 2021 03:38:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210517200907.1459182-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20210517130450.v7.2.Ieb731d23680db4700cc41fe51ccc73ba0b785fb7@changeid> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 12:38:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/10] dt-bindings: display: simple: List hpd properties in panel-simple To: Doug Anderson Cc: Rob Herring , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Sam Ravnborg , Stanislav Lisovskiy , Lyude Paul , Thierry Reding , Stephen Boyd , Bjorn Andersson , linux-arm-msm , Maarten Lankhorst , dri-devel , Rob Clark , Steev Klimaszewski , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Thierry Reding , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:58 PM Doug Anderson wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:42 AM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 3:09 PM Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > > > > These are described in panel-common.yaml but if I don't list them in > > > panel-simple then I get yells when running 'dt_binding_check' in a > > > future patch. List them along with other properties that seem to be > > > listed in panel-simple for similar reasons. > > > > If you have HPD, is it still a simple panel? I don't see this as an > > omission because the use of these properties for simple panels was > > never documented IIRC. > > I would say so. It is currently supported by panel-simple in Linux. Of > course, you could make the argument that panel-simple is no longer > really "simple" because of things like this... I think it should be renamed panel-panacea at this point. I think I pointed it out before. But not my pick so I rest my case. Yours, Linus Walleij