From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD45AC49EA3 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54ED61C75 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232648AbhF1MFo (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:05:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59940 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232608AbhF1MFn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:05:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4817DC061574; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 05:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id d12so15270037pgd.9; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 05:03:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hC95X8dILV4yUsxnWcqyaUSRLR/4KhkkqpuXQlMJ+os=; b=j/1qnIN05R1GrGDHQLT945i6wPcIK8UlPXIPynREbRgcev1CYX2vV3PdaSuMf/fkFk 5cqvLfoq5LYsQxXfM7WQ0FhWh/GEM4zDYp5YUE+qMxSxIVkZ7BKnlyGaKE/bSRaOvHBg TBZ0p8k4IY1hA9bUBHOp66D2kooiwq9RIKp0v+M+UCECYePx1BGSp6UWwbcxRdr1vGBU YhrN7Hyf6PH/SHx5y8fvtG5Q53KD9JWDK6pJ02iF3Cy0+B3mLGowTZUmWFnuQlP3f7Nx +XjgCAXiaMUgzXVlCRGJGktRvkV7Bp51kBbOk6qaMNw6n64Vu4Jj8gRaEQVLEsn/xxNv kMUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hC95X8dILV4yUsxnWcqyaUSRLR/4KhkkqpuXQlMJ+os=; b=RnPTzM1taTLl4W5n+cIexpiXT28ml9J8lJs3VAWL6VH+n5K193xCj1EQARZQ0jY4lA 4ML/VaJaSIzavDrc6svh8wD3wkAqLI43AVbXvFFRhgRBcrkuBW+eE9HhMZlevHPW7IqS tMWgGeAhV3YbKX9IILxu2iONOl250J+LcsWC9WHPJTff8TWXI2nfODpyi9SQJXJyxfZ/ uZeqbhcqL+HQlhu4w/yda75TxHJnX+VY7LU3NVJwbhL3l3rv7xHoyyUauWIS9h+p0Lnd T4di5v1ifT1xbKisBDy/r+BcEhefhgzgiP7/ouB6PmuhlU/O02WGODi5ZVUfKNhD6E+Z n7Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bKDNQSI/J+Esjde5p2KKiwTUl4Sk75mK+Wt2nz1A/62hHj37v s/TSKrT/y5a/1TvHm38Lf7LFxCQWQVU1TZaOFo8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAv9znER5hh/JOnKHGaD1NRGWHP3IrFfiODa8IXBazHOnTNyl7L/0rKn7rdXQ7fCvZ/iGF6s9IOTuD8HfB+dg= X-Received: by 2002:a63:f609:: with SMTP id m9mr1004059pgh.74.1624881796677; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 05:03:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210625235532.19575-1-dipenp@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:02:39 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] Intro to Hardware timestamping engine To: Linus Walleij Cc: Ye Xiang , Drew Fustini , Sandeep Singh , Dipen Patel , Jarkko Nikula , Thierry Reding , Jon Hunter , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-tegra , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Bartosz Golaszewski , Kent Gibson , devicetree , Linux Documentation List , Rob Herring , Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 5:41 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 3:08 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > To summarize upstream discussion: > > > - It was heavily favoured by Linus and Kent to extend GPIOLIB and supporting > > > GPIO drivers to add HTE functionality and I agreed to experiment with it. > > > > I guess this series should include more people from different > > companies, especially documentation parts. This may be used by > > different hardware and quite different vendors. Developing a framework > > like this for only one vendor is no go in general. > > I forwarded patch 00 to the IIO list and Jonathan Cameron, > and let's page Ye Xiang who made a bunch of contributions > from Intel's side to IIO directly. (Hi Ye, please check this concept > if you have time!) > > The actually most important target group would be people > doing things like sensor fusion where a common timebase is > important, I don't know who does really, but Sandeep Singh from > AMD has contributed the AMD Sensor Fusion hub in > drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid and might know a few things about this > though I don't think SFH would need this directly. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensor_fusion > > Also Paging Drew Fustini, who knows a lot of maker and tinker > people, he might know a bit about this or know someone who > knows. Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko