From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: counter: new bindings for TI eQEP Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 07:34:42 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20190722154538.5314-1-david@lechnology.com> <20190722154538.5314-2-david@lechnology.com> <20190727204836.1514265d@archlinux> <20190802072513.GA30522@icarus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190802072513.GA30522@icarus> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: William Breathitt Gray Cc: David Lechner , "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" , linux-omap , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Jonathan Cameron , =?UTF-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Cousson?= , Tony Lindgren , Thierry Reding , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PWM List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:25 AM William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 08:48:36PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:45:35 -0500 > > David Lechner wrote: > > > > > This documents device tree binding for the Texas Instruments Enhanced > > > Quadrature Encoder Pulse (eQEP) Module found in various TI SoCs. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Lechner > > > > Up to William given it is a counter binding, (unless Rob overrules) > > but new bindings are generally preferred as yaml. > > > > Content looks fine to me. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jonathan > > Rob, > > Would you prefer these bindings as yaml, or shall I accept them as they > are now? Still up to you at this point, but I certainly prefer them to be DT schema. Rob