devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, grant.likely@arm.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>,
	joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/16] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active to add a struct device argument
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:37:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALiNf29N3U5GZKNN90NzjSeQ0WG4dxyRzU97fJ-r9OuChzLWKA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f84aa4c-f966-0986-b5a4-eecbf3b454ec@arm.com>

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:31 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021-04-22 09:15, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Update is_swiotlb_active to add a struct device argument. This will be
> > useful later to allow for restricted DMA pool.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c | 2 +-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c        | 2 +-
> >   drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c                   | 2 +-
> >   include/linux/swiotlb.h                      | 4 ++--
> >   kernel/dma/direct.c                          | 2 +-
> >   kernel/dma/swiotlb.c                         | 4 ++--
> >   6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c
> > index ce6b664b10aa..7d48c433446b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c
> > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_get_pages_internal(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> >
> >       max_order = MAX_ORDER;
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
> > -     if (is_swiotlb_active()) {
> > +     if (is_swiotlb_active(NULL)) {
> >               unsigned int max_segment;
> >
> >               max_segment = swiotlb_max_segment();
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> > index e8b506a6685b..2a2ae6d6cf6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> > @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
> >       }
> >
> >   #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)
> > -     need_swiotlb = is_swiotlb_active();
> > +     need_swiotlb = is_swiotlb_active(NULL);
> >   #endif
> >
> >       ret = ttm_device_init(&drm->ttm.bdev, &nouveau_bo_driver, drm->dev->dev,
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> > index b7a8f3a1921f..6d548ce53ce7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> > @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static int pcifront_connect_and_init_dma(struct pcifront_device *pdev)
> >
> >       spin_unlock(&pcifront_dev_lock);
> >
> > -     if (!err && !is_swiotlb_active()) {
> > +     if (!err && !is_swiotlb_active(NULL)) {
> >               err = pci_xen_swiotlb_init_late();
> >               if (err)
> >                       dev_err(&pdev->xdev->dev, "Could not setup SWIOTLB!\n");
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > index 2a6cca07540b..c530c976d18b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
> >   void __init swiotlb_exit(void);
> >   unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void);
> >   size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev);
> > -bool is_swiotlb_active(void);
> > +bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev);
> >   void __init swiotlb_adjust_size(unsigned long size);
> >   #else
> >   #define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE
> > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static inline size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev)
> >       return SIZE_MAX;
> >   }
> >
> > -static inline bool is_swiotlb_active(void)
> > +static inline bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev)
> >   {
> >       return false;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > index 84c9feb5474a..7a88c34d0867 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> >   size_t dma_direct_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev)
> >   {
> >       /* If SWIOTLB is active, use its maximum mapping size */
> > -     if (is_swiotlb_active() &&
> > +     if (is_swiotlb_active(dev) &&
> >           (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE))
>
> I wonder if it's worth trying to fold these other conditions into
> is_swiotlb_active() itself? I'm not entirely sure what matters for Xen,
> but for the other cases it seems like they probably only care about
> whether bouncing may occur for their particular device or not (possibly
> they want to be using dma_max_mapping_size() now anyway - TBH I'm
> struggling to make sense of what the swiotlb_max_segment business is
> supposed to mean).

I think leaving those conditions outside of is_swiotlb_active() might
help avoid confusion with is_dev_swiotlb_force() in patch #9? We need
is_dev_swiotlb_force() only because the restricted DMA pool supports
memory allocation, but the default swiotlb doesn't.

>
> Otherwise, patch #9 will need to touch here as well to make sure that
> per-device forced bouncing is reflected correctly.

You're right. Otherwise, is_dev_swiotlb_force is needed here.


>
> Robin.
>
> >               return swiotlb_max_mapping_size(dev);
> >       return SIZE_MAX;
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > index ffbb8724e06c..1d221343f1c8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > @@ -659,9 +659,9 @@ size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev)
> >       return ((size_t)IO_TLB_SIZE) * IO_TLB_SEGSIZE;
> >   }
> >
> > -bool is_swiotlb_active(void)
> > +bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev)
> >   {
> > -     return io_tlb_default_mem != NULL;
> > +     return get_io_tlb_mem(dev) != NULL;
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_swiotlb_active);
> >
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-26 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-22  8:14 [PATCH v5 00/16] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] swiotlb: Fix the type of index Claire Chang
2021-04-23  7:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] swiotlb: Add DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization Claire Chang
2021-04-23 11:34   ` Steven Price
2021-04-26 16:37     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-28  9:50       ` Steven Price
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active " Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:31   ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-26 16:37     ` Claire Chang [this message]
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] swiotlb: Bounce data from/to restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] swiotlb: Move alloc_size to find_slots Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] dma-direct: Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:46   ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-03 14:26     ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool Claire Chang
2021-04-22  8:15 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] of: Add plumbing for " Claire Chang
2021-04-23  2:52   ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:35   ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-26 16:38     ` Claire Chang
2021-05-10  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 00/16] Restricted DMA Claire Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALiNf29N3U5GZKNN90NzjSeQ0WG4dxyRzU97fJ-r9OuChzLWKA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tientzu@chromium.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jxgao@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v5 08/16] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active to add a struct device argument' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox