From: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
grant.likely@arm.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
bskeggs@redhat.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@google.com>,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:37:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9abca62-328d-d0d6-a8a6-a67475171f92@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:34 PM Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 22/04/2021 09:14, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Add the initialization function to create restricted DMA pools from
> > matching reserved-memory nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/device.h | 4 +++
> > include/linux/swiotlb.h | 3 +-
> > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> > index 38a2071cf776..4987608ea4ff 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/device.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> > @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ struct dev_links_info {
> > * @dma_pools: Dma pools (if dma'ble device).
> > * @dma_mem: Internal for coherent mem override.
> > * @cma_area: Contiguous memory area for dma allocations
> > + * @dma_io_tlb_mem: Internal for swiotlb io_tlb_mem override.
> > * @archdata: For arch-specific additions.
> > * @of_node: Associated device tree node.
> > * @fwnode: Associated device node supplied by platform firmware.
> > @@ -521,6 +522,9 @@ struct device {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_CMA
> > struct cma *cma_area; /* contiguous memory area for dma
> > allocations */
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
> > + struct io_tlb_mem *dma_io_tlb_mem;
> > #endif
> > /* arch specific additions */
> > struct dev_archdata archdata;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > index 216854a5e513..03ad6e3b4056 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ extern enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force;
> > * range check to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this
> > * API.
> > * @nslabs: The number of IO TLB blocks (in groups of 64) between @start and
> > - * @end. This is command line adjustable via setup_io_tlb_npages.
> > + * @end. For default swiotlb, this is command line adjustable via
> > + * setup_io_tlb_npages.
> > * @used: The number of used IO TLB block.
> > * @list: The free list describing the number of free entries available
> > * from each index.
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > index 57a9adb920bf..ffbb8724e06c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,13 @@
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#endif
> >
> > #include <asm/io.h>
> > #include <asm/dma.h>
> > @@ -681,3 +688,76 @@ static int __init swiotlb_create_default_debugfs(void)
> > late_initcall(swiotlb_create_default_debugfs);
> >
> > #endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
> > +static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
> > + struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct io_tlb_mem *mem = rmem->priv;
> > + unsigned long nslabs = rmem->size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + if (dev->dma_io_tlb_mem)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* Since multiple devices can share the same pool, the private data,
> > + * io_tlb_mem struct, will be initialized by the first device attached
> > + * to it.
> > + */
> > + if (!mem) {
> > + mem = kzalloc(struct_size(mem, slots, nslabs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > + if (!PageHighMem(pfn_to_page(PHYS_PFN(rmem->base)))) {
> > + kfree(mem);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM */
> > + swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(mem, rmem->base, nslabs, false);
> > +
> > + rmem->priv = mem;
> > + }
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > + if (!io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs)
> > + io_tlb_default_mem->debugfs =
> > + debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
>
> At this point it's possible for io_tlb_default_mem to be NULL, leading
> to a splat.
Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> But even then if it's not and we have the situation where debugfs==NULL
> then the debugfs_create_dir() here will cause a subsequent attempt in
> swiotlb_create_debugfs() to fail (directory already exists) leading to
> mem->debugfs being assigned an error value. I suspect the creation of
> the debugfs directory needs to be separated from io_tlb_default_mem
> being set.
debugfs creation should move into the if (!mem) {...} above to avoid
duplication.
I think having a separated struct dentry pointer for the default
debugfs should be enough?
if (!debugfs)
debugfs = debugfs_create_dir("swiotlb", NULL);
swiotlb_create_debugfs(mem, rmem->name, debugfs);
>
> Other than that I gave this series a go with our prototype of Arm's
> Confidential Computer Architecture[1] - since the majority of the
> guest's memory is protected from the host the restricted DMA pool allows
> (only) a small area to be shared with the host.
>
> After fixing (well hacking round) the above it all seems to be working
> fine with virtio drivers.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> [1]
> https://www.arm.com/why-arm/architecture/security-features/arm-confidential-compute-architecture
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-26 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 8:14 [PATCH v5 00/16] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] swiotlb: Fix the type of index Claire Chang
2021-04-23 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-22 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] swiotlb: Add DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization Claire Chang
2021-04-23 11:34 ` Steven Price
2021-04-26 16:37 ` Claire Chang [this message]
2021-04-28 9:50 ` Steven Price
2021-04-22 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] swiotlb: Add a new get_io_tlb_mem getter Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active " Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:31 ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-26 16:37 ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] swiotlb: Bounce data from/to restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] swiotlb: Move alloc_size to find_slots Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] dma-direct: Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] dma-direct: Allocate memory from restricted DMA pool if available Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:46 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-03 14:26 ` Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:15 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] of: Add plumbing for " Claire Chang
2021-04-23 2:52 ` Claire Chang
2021-04-23 13:35 ` Robin Murphy
2021-04-26 16:38 ` Claire Chang
2021-05-10 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 00/16] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALiNf2_tffc65PhLxCr3-+gmVYKGO2HjYiJVkBNa5U5HYdi9pg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tientzu@chromium.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jxgao@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).