Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] ARM: dts: meson8b: odroidc1: Add usb phy power node

[Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>]

Hi Martin,

Thanks for the review comments.

On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 01:16, Martin Blumenstingl
<martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Anand,
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add missing usb phy power node for phy mode fix below warning.
> > P5V0 regulator suppy input voltage range to USB host controller.
> low prio - typo: suppy -> supply
>
> > As descriped in the C1+ schematics, GPIO GPIOAO_5 is used to
> low prio - typo: descriped -> described
>
I definitely run checkpatch with the spellcheck option but I need to
improve on this aspect.

> > enable input power to USB ports, set it to Active Low.
> >
> > [    1.253149] phy phy-c1108820.phy.0: Looking up phy-supply from device tree
> > [    1.253166] phy phy-c1108820.phy.0: Looking up phy-supply property
> >                 in node /soc/cbus@c1100000/phy@8820 failed
> high prio:
> Can you please describe how I can test this patch?
> My concern is that previously I have tested your patch with ACTIVE_LOW
> and ACTIVE_HIGH polarity.
> In both cases USB is working and I cannot observe any change (apart
> from this debug message being gone).
>
> In the Odroid-C1 schematics (page 1) GPIOAO.BIT5 is connected to USB_OTG *only*.
> I cannot give my Acked-/Reviewed-/Tested-by without a description of
> how I can actually test the GPIO potion of this patch.
>
> [...]
> > +               /*
> > +                * signal name from schematics: PWREN - GPIOAO.BIT5
> > +                */
> > +               gpios = <&gpio_ao GPIOAO_5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> low prio:
> Even though it's strictly not necessary I think this is confusing to read.
> Since there's no "enable-active-high" property the GPIO will be
> considered as "active low".
> My suggestion is to change GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH to GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
>
My apologies, I might have sent the wrong set of patches its
GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW I meant
I have formatted with and in the course of testing and verifying It
might have got SKIPPED.
I didn't do this intentionally it happen with a mistake with my two
repositories.
I don't intend to repeat my mistake, again and again, *sorry for the trouble*.

> Also if you have any extra information since you last pinged me on IRC
> then it would be great if you could document it.
> I am referring to these IRC message, where you are stating that the
> correct polarity should be "active high":
> <armoon> xdarklight I have a question on USB GPIO Polarity on Odroid C1+
 > <armoon> As per the
> https://dn.odroid.com/S805/Schematics/odroid-c1+_rev0.4_20160226.pdf
> <armoon> MP62551DGT-LF IC controls the power for the USB PORTS
> <armoon> https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/277/MP62550-1384050.pdf is
> MP62551DGT datasheet
> <armoon> As per the data sheet in section ORDERING INFORMATION  Active
> enable signal is set below MP62551DGT Active High
>

[1] https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/277/MP62550-1384050.pdf

I have read the datasheets MP62551DGT EN*  pin its Enable input. Active Low:
       *EN I Enable input. Active Low: (MP62550), Active High: (MP62551).*

I have tested with ACTIVE_LOW and followed all the steps invalidating
 this with debugfs output.

Last login: Tue Jul 13 00:02:49 2021 from 10.0.0.14
[alarm@archl-c1e ~]$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/gpio | grep usb
 gpio-1953 (USB_HUB_RST_N       |usb-hub-reset       ) out hi
 gpio-1954 (USB_OTG_PWREN       |regulator-usb-pwr-en) out lo ACTIVE LOW

> [...]
> >  &usb1_phy {
> >         status = "okay";
> > +       phy-supply = <&usb_pwr_en>;
> medium priority:
> I have raised the following concern in one of my previous emails on this topic:
> > The mistake I made before is considering USB VBUS as PHY power supply.
> > I believe the USB PHY is actually powered by the AVDD18_USB_ADC and
> > USB33_VDDIOH signals. See the S905 datasheet [0], page 25
> > These are 1.8V and 3.3V signals while you are adding a 5V regulator.
> you replied with:
> > OK, thanks.
> so I don't understand what "OK, thanks" means.
> If it means "Martin, you are wrong" then please provide a description
> so I can also learn something!

Yes, I understood your inputs. But from the logs below is seen to
looking for phy-supply
This is the reason I went ahead with phy-supply as the core phy node
needs this property.

Please check below commit
e841ec956e53 ("ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb-odroidc2: fix usb1 power supply")

[    1.253149] phy phy-c1108820.phy.0: Looking up phy-supply from device tree
[    1.253166] phy phy-c1108820.phy.0: Looking up phy-supply property
in node /soc/cbus@c1100000/phy@8820 failed
[    1.255031] pwm-regulator regulator-vcck: Failed to get PWM, deferring probe
[    1.256730] pwm-regulator regulator-vddee: Failed to get PWM, deferring probe
[    1.260300] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: mapped PA c90c0000 to VA (ptrval)
[    1.260446] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: Looking up vusb_d-supply from device tree
[    1.260460] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: Looking up vusb_d-supply property in
node /soc/usb@c90c0000 failed
[    1.260490] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: supply vusb_d not found, using dummy regulator
[    1.260606] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: Looking up vusb_a-supply from device tree
[    1.260620] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: Looking up vusb_a-supply property in
node /soc/usb@c90c0000 failed
[    1.260641] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: supply vusb_a not found, using dummy regulator
[    1.260717] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: registering common handler for irq35
[    1.260772] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: Looking up vbus-supply from device tree
[    1.260784] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: Looking up vbus-supply property in
node /soc/usb@c90c0000 failed
[    1.261949] dwc2 c90c0000.usb: Core Release: 3.10a (snpsid=4f54310a)

>
>
> Best regards,
> Martin

-Anand