From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978A1C352A5 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C447206ED for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="I/xFN0o6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729014AbgBJPNR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:13:17 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-f179.google.com ([209.85.166.179]:45820 "EHLO mail-il1-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728485AbgBJPNQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:13:16 -0500 Received: by mail-il1-f179.google.com with SMTP id p8so465505iln.12 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:13:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FhN4XtFCJkoq1uQy3zAa0gdyCp3Sl71uMPy2Eyj8+bE=; b=I/xFN0o6OHNqlV1vOX3xfGZ8d/9J7hUwnWgRkbtmq5yervupWrbgBcGxfGD0b8sYLC uwcGuejk6bD/ZVkpBth8Jjaa713iNs++YsuJPMlSmtwGys5Gej+Xh2SSNPtHIoOeigwl V98nNsFb2EBay4fOu+ill9j4oWB/gkUdI0yu51YKQnRETpoRkcL5c00+Gq/LH+LCLxlH laj+IEGsZEzC7ASAVdAWUuf/cVDMbEiNHcd2qjXFZ2RG1UO3Q6bgSxySNgoDxU5Sc2K5 iyTcCsUu5ozZRmiqGYQtnaI/XkwlXp7xqsE/jANCwbVG2Kvz90jDI8wrUC7x+dciP+Rx JiOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FhN4XtFCJkoq1uQy3zAa0gdyCp3Sl71uMPy2Eyj8+bE=; b=rLbTh2fwszkfGH6AoHBaIbc7yggy1Gfc9VGhW0dWOSn6QY8kqvAFc3/woVlY9NKxc8 9yATnU4iJIdwU8i+y84ZrR1w3IuDVdqnQKd18pIvlnRWRl7569CUzsfgTkjMyunkt1XV xrN1tSTSJCTvsswByVg7H3y1E4aKVHBByHyLrUyjpK5LGM7T5qTcebd+92m8XTpUAl9X 4uwv0SRekYeCMOIGCh1nKRkf2mg6DYkhN2vF1ZHXr8bov6X60rzb3u2TfIlD9bbYVQDo A06ziA/WzjC2msY3eiedWNTZgX+dFckpE2pO2n74wCOYkudoa85av2vCeL2h+AOpvYm0 LQpw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVULL5KJkl4ewwHYJuJi3srAlyHiZsbUT1dXy2vHmURLtuUwq9C 7l1ez96FTZDBofD8xlzljSgT6nWPWPCtoy8BYqhlnR1ih+U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8NJ/XJCZgc65CapYNrLpMIOjiJgGhRG/vY2GtMRsBh+nwgtkTAaBtEJw8o0Ee3qShBauPgKT/rw5SSdeonlg= X-Received: by 2002:a92:ba8d:: with SMTP id t13mr1821680ill.207.1581347594542; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:13:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191120034451.30102-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> <20200110153347.GA29372@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Olof Johansson Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:12:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 00/12] PCI: Recode Mobiveil driver and add PCIe Gen4 driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs To: "Z.q. Hou" , "bhelgaas@google.com" Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in" , Leo Li , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "andrew.murray@arm.com" , Mingkai Hu , "M.h. Lian" , Xiaowei Bao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:57 AM Z.q. Hou wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > Thanks a lot for your comments! > And sorry for my delay respond! Actually, they apply with only minor conflicts on top of current -next. Bjorn, any chance we can get you to pick these up pretty soon? They enable full use of a promising ARM developer system, the SolidRun HoneyComb, and would be quite valuable for me and others to be able to use with mainline or -next without any additional patches applied -- which this patchset achieves. I know there are pending revisions based on feedback. I'll leave it up to you and others to determine if that can be done with incremental patches on top, or if it should be fixed before the initial patchset is applied. But all in all, it's holding up adaption by me and surely others of a very interesting platform -- I'm looking to replace my aging MacchiatoBin with one of these and would need PCIe/NVMe to work before I do. Thanks! -Olof