From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"GPIO SUBSYSTEM <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List" <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas" <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC 5/7] pwm: rcar: remove a redundant condition in rcar_pwm_apply()
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 02:56:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB4536907871FEDA8C89271360D8D40@OSBPR01MB4536.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190806160007.mqwzixddhzejbmcb@pengutronix.de>
Hello,
> From: Uwe Kleine-König, Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 1:00 AM
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:05:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:08 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
> > <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote:
> > > Since the rcar_pwm_apply() has already check whehter state->enabled
> > > is not set or not, this patch removes a redundant condition.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >
> > This is completely independent from the rest of the series, and can be applied
> > immediately, right?
>
> The original patch didn't make it into my mailbox. I only see a few
> replies. Is it only me?
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pwm/list/ doesn't seem to
> have it either.
I don't know why but, linux-renesas-soc ML only got the patch series.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=143129
JFYI, but I submitted another patch yesterday, and it seemed to be archived on all MLs:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg322085.html
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/6/274
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11078469/
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-07 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-08 9:07 [PATCH RFC 0/7] treewide: modify sh-pfc and add support pwm duty zero Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-07-08 9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: add new flags into struct sh_pfc_pin_config Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-07-08 15:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-08-06 8:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-07-08 9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: remove incomplete flag "cfg->type" Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-07-28 23:02 ` Linus Walleij
2019-07-29 5:16 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06 8:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-06 9:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-06 11:48 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-07-08 9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Rollback to mux if requires when the gpio is freed Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06 9:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-06 11:38 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06 12:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-07-08 9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] dt-bindings: pwm: rcar: Add specific gpios property to output duty zero Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06 9:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-07-08 9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] pwm: rcar: remove a redundant condition in rcar_pwm_apply() Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06 9:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-06 11:39 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-06 16:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-07 2:56 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda [this message]
2019-08-07 6:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-07-08 9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] pwm: rcar: Add gpio support to output duty zero Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-07 7:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-08-08 3:52 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-08 6:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-08 7:02 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-08-08 7:31 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-07-08 9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] arm64: dts: renesas: salvator-common: add gpio property into pwm1 Yoshihiro Shimoda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OSBPR01MB4536907871FEDA8C89271360D8D40@OSBPR01MB4536.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
--to=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).