devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	<joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<guohanjun@huawei.com>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	<rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	<vdumpa@nvidia.com>, <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, <vivek.gautam@arm.com>,
	<wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:24:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b683c66f-68e7-4174-74a5-2ea7c44f54ac@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302092644.2553014-8-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

Hi Jean,

Reviewed-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>

On 2021/3/2 17:26, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> When handling faults from the event or PRI queue, we need to find the
> struct device associated with a SID. Add a rb_tree to keep track of
> SIDs.
> 
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  13 +-
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index f985817c967a..7b15b7580c6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -639,6 +639,15 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
>  
>  	/* IOMMU core code handle */
>  	struct iommu_device		iommu;
> +
> +	struct rb_root			streams;
> +	struct mutex			streams_mutex;
> +};
> +
> +struct arm_smmu_stream {
> +	u32				id;
> +	struct arm_smmu_master		*master;
> +	struct rb_node			node;
>  };
>  
>  /* SMMU private data for each master */
> @@ -647,8 +656,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_master {
>  	struct device			*dev;
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain		*domain;
>  	struct list_head		domain_head;
> -	u32				*sids;
> -	unsigned int			num_sids;
> +	struct arm_smmu_stream		*streams;
> +	unsigned int			num_streams;
>  	bool				ats_enabled;
>  	bool				sva_enabled;
>  	struct list_head		bonds;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 7edce914c45e..d148bb6d4289 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -909,8 +909,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_sync_cd(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
>  	list_for_each_entry(master, &smmu_domain->devices, domain_head) {
> -		for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) {
> -			cmd.cfgi.sid = master->sids[i];
> +		for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; i++) {
> +			cmd.cfgi.sid = master->streams[i].id;
>  			arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add(smmu, &cmds, &cmd);
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -1355,6 +1355,28 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/* smmu->streams_mutex must be held */
> +__maybe_unused
> +static struct arm_smmu_master *
> +arm_smmu_find_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
> +{
> +	struct rb_node *node;
> +	struct arm_smmu_stream *stream;
> +
> +	node = smmu->streams.rb_node;
> +	while (node) {
> +		stream = rb_entry(node, struct arm_smmu_stream, node);
> +		if (stream->id < sid)
> +			node = node->rb_right;
> +		else if (stream->id > sid)
> +			node = node->rb_left;
> +		else
> +			return stream->master;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  /* IRQ and event handlers */
>  static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
>  {
> @@ -1588,8 +1610,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_atc_inv_master(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
>  
>  	arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(0, 0, 0, &cmd);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) {
> -		cmd.atc.sid = master->sids[i];
> +	for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; i++) {
> +		cmd.atc.sid = master->streams[i].id;
>  		arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(master->smmu, &cmd);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1632,8 +1654,8 @@ int arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, int ssid,
>  		if (!master->ats_enabled)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) {
> -			cmd.atc.sid = master->sids[i];
> +		for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; i++) {
> +			cmd.atc.sid = master->streams[i].id;
>  			arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add(smmu_domain->smmu, &cmds, &cmd);
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -2065,13 +2087,13 @@ static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
>  	int i, j;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; ++i) {
> -		u32 sid = master->sids[i];
> +	for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; ++i) {
> +		u32 sid = master->streams[i].id;
>  		__le64 *step = arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(smmu, sid);
>  
>  		/* Bridged PCI devices may end up with duplicated IDs */
>  		for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
> -			if (master->sids[j] == sid)
> +			if (master->streams[j].id == sid)
>  				break;
>  		if (j < i)
>  			continue;
> @@ -2345,11 +2367,101 @@ static bool arm_smmu_sid_in_range(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>  	return sid < limit;
>  }
>  
> +static int arm_smmu_insert_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> +				  struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct arm_smmu_stream *new_stream, *cur_stream;
> +	struct rb_node **new_node, *parent_node = NULL;
> +	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(master->dev);
> +
> +	master->streams = kcalloc(fwspec->num_ids, sizeof(*master->streams),
> +				  GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!master->streams)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	master->num_streams = fwspec->num_ids;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> +	for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
> +		u32 sid = fwspec->ids[i];
> +
> +		new_stream = &master->streams[i];
> +		new_stream->id = sid;
> +		new_stream->master = master;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Check the SIDs are in range of the SMMU and our stream table
> +		 */
> +		if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid)) {
> +			ret = -ERANGE;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Ensure l2 strtab is initialised */
> +		if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> +			ret = arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(smmu, sid);
> +			if (ret)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Insert into SID tree */
> +		new_node = &(smmu->streams.rb_node);
> +		while (*new_node) {
> +			cur_stream = rb_entry(*new_node, struct arm_smmu_stream,
> +					      node);
> +			parent_node = *new_node;
> +			if (cur_stream->id > new_stream->id) {
> +				new_node = &((*new_node)->rb_left);
> +			} else if (cur_stream->id < new_stream->id) {
> +				new_node = &((*new_node)->rb_right);
> +			} else {
> +				dev_warn(master->dev,
> +					 "stream %u already in tree\n",
> +					 cur_stream->id);
> +				ret = -EINVAL;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +
> +		rb_link_node(&new_stream->node, parent_node, new_node);
> +		rb_insert_color(&new_stream->node, &smmu->streams);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> +			rb_erase(&master->streams[i].node, &smmu->streams);
> +		kfree(master->streams);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smmu_remove_master(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> +	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(master->dev);
> +
> +	if (!smmu || !master->streams)
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> +	for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++)
> +		rb_erase(&master->streams[i].node, &smmu->streams);
> +	mutex_unlock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> +
> +	kfree(master->streams);
> +}
> +
>  static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops;
>  
>  static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	int i, ret;
> +	int ret;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_master *master;
>  	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> @@ -2370,27 +2482,12 @@ static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	master->dev = dev;
>  	master->smmu = smmu;
> -	master->sids = fwspec->ids;
> -	master->num_sids = fwspec->num_ids;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&master->bonds);
>  	dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, master);
>  
> -	/* Check the SIDs are in range of the SMMU and our stream table */
> -	for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) {
> -		u32 sid = master->sids[i];
> -
> -		if (!arm_smmu_sid_in_range(smmu, sid)) {
> -			ret = -ERANGE;
> -			goto err_free_master;
> -		}
> -
> -		/* Ensure l2 strtab is initialised */
> -		if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> -			ret = arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(smmu, sid);
> -			if (ret)
> -				goto err_free_master;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	ret = arm_smmu_insert_master(smmu, master);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_free_master;
>  
>  	device_property_read_u32(dev, "pasid-num-bits", &master->ssid_bits);
>  	master->ssid_bits = min(smmu->ssid_bits, master->ssid_bits);
> @@ -2429,6 +2526,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>  	WARN_ON(arm_smmu_master_sva_enabled(master));
>  	arm_smmu_detach_dev(master);
>  	arm_smmu_disable_pasid(master);
> +	arm_smmu_remove_master(master);
>  	kfree(master);
>  	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
>  }
> @@ -2852,6 +2950,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_structures(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	mutex_init(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> +	smmu->streams = RB_ROOT;
> +
>  	ret = arm_smmu_init_queues(smmu);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-02 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02  9:26 [PATCH v13 00/10] iommu: I/O page faults for SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 01/10] iommu: Fix comment for struct iommu_fwspec Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-25 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 02/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use device properties for pasid-num-bits Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-25 17:36   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 03/10] iommu: Separate IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF from IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-03  5:04   ` Lu Baolu
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 04/10] iommu/vt-d: Support IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 05/10] uacce: Enable IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 06/10] iommu: Add a page fault handler Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02 23:59   ` Jacob Pan
2021-03-23 10:50     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-03  5:27   ` Lu Baolu
2021-03-23 10:51     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-03  5:57   ` Raj, Ashok
2021-03-23 10:53     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 07/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02 12:24   ` Keqian Zhu [this message]
2021-03-25 17:48   ` Will Deacon
2021-03-26  9:49     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 08/10] dt-bindings: document stall property for IOMMU masters Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 09/10] ACPI/IORT: Enable stall support for platform devices Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-02  9:26 ` [PATCH v13 10/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add " Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-19 17:40   ` Auger Eric
2021-03-26  9:52   ` Auger Eric
2021-03-18  0:25 ` [PATCH v13 00/10] iommu: I/O page faults for SMMUv3 Krishna Reddy
2021-03-30 17:17 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-04-01  8:57   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b683c66f-68e7-4174-74a5-2ea7c44f54ac@huawei.com \
    --to=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@arm.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).