From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DB2C4363C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF42120870 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727569AbgJGIc6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 04:32:58 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:35719 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726463AbgJGIc6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 04:32:58 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5ndz4TCmz1r7RL; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:32:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5ndz3J0Xz1qrgJ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:32:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kGQVMSLCmoAp; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:32:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: pcvUSIzQLY05+7/obRnGy3wsZnEASLSEanb0nc8p0nE= Received: from [IPv6:::1] (p578adb1c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.138.219.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:32:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: display: mxsfb: Convert binding to YAML To: Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Stefan Agner , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Guido_G=c3=bcnther?= , Rob Herring , Pengutronix Kernel Team , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20201007012438.27970-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <20201007012438.27970-2-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:32:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201007012438.27970-2-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/7/20 3:24 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: [...] > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - fsl,imx23-lcdif > + - fsl,imx28-lcdif > + - fsl,imx6sx-lcdif > + - fsl,imx8mq-lcdif There is no fsl,imx8mq-lcdif in drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c, so the DT must specify compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif" (since imx28 is the oldest SoC with LCDIF V4). Should the compatible be added to drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_drv.c or dropped from the YAML file or neither ? [...]