From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54C5C2D0A3 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4806F206FA for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="QC5WB4Ks" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726317AbgKFO0X (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:26:23 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:44536 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726010AbgKFO0X (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:26:23 -0500 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0A6EQHKS004985; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:26:17 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1604672777; bh=tZdFBz0aT3J6OyDLVBbI6bykmdXJVAt1+uje5SUJfAk=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QC5WB4KsN9mfQRlRYidiROPHqHofU3hb70ATGZH2pjL9LnAcdAj8EuuhTo885SFJ8 IbSFdayrzcpFZKOpl5Xm9VqcXn4g0AgLL5teFbxKm2Dn35yAZ9hH4Q+SBMIWqgmfj8 ZKepkzEt5mVQ20chSp/bCLwCfplskTPu1+uh5c1Q= Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (dfle102.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.23]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0A6EQHVt072336 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:26:17 -0600 Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:26:17 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:26:17 -0600 Received: from [10.250.34.171] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0A6EQHoq008378; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:26:17 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add R5F nodes on TI K3 AM65x and J721E SoCs To: Lokesh Vutla , Nishanth Menon , Tero Kristo CC: , References: <20201029033802.15366-1-s-anna@ti.com> <547ca06c-9895-b164-60ab-5909e6c78983@ti.com> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:26:17 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <547ca06c-9895-b164-60ab-5909e6c78983@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/6/20 5:43 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > > > On 29/10/20 9:07 am, Suman Anna wrote: >> Hi Nishanth, >> >> The TI K3 R5F remoteproc driver and bindings were merged into 5.10-rc1, >> and this series adds the follow-on base dt nodes for the R5F remote >> processors on TI K3 AM65x and J721E SoCs. Additional memory nodes were >> also added to boot these processors successfully on applicable TI K3 >> AM65x and J721E EVM boards. The series uses previously accepted mailbox >> nodes. >> >> The patches follow slightly different convention between AM65x and >> J721E. The reserved-memory nodes are added directly in the relevant >> board dts file for AM65x boards, while they are added in the common >> k3-j721e-som-p0.dtsi file for J721E SoCs following the similar addition >> of K3 C66x and C71x DSP nodes in 5.10-rc1. >> >> Patches apply on top of your 5.10-rc1 based staging branch. >> >> I have validated the IPC functionality using System Firmware v2020.04a >> and corresponding IPC example firmwares. > > > Series looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla > Thanks Lokesh. > On a side note: any reason not to add R5f nodes for J7200? J7200 nodes would have to wait until the corresponding dt-bindings and driver updates make it into mainline. They do use different compatibles, and I will post them in the next couple of weeks. regards Suman