From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC1AC2D0B1 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A022082E for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727511AbgBFOPs (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:15:48 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59140 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727481AbgBFOPs (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:15:48 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA60E30E; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 06:15:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.37.12.48] (unknown [10.37.12.48]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B1CF3F52E; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 06:15:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable Energy Model framework To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: kgene@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, Chanwoo Choi , robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, =?UTF-8?Q?Bart=c5=82omiej_=c5=bbo=c5=82nierkiewicz?= , dietmar.eggemann@arm.com References: <20200127215453.15144-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <20200127215453.15144-4-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <20200131204118.GA27284@kozik-lap> From: Lukasz Luba Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:15:42 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2/6/20 12:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 13:49, Lukasz Luba wrote: >>>> As mentioned in response to patch 1/3. The fist patch would create MC >>>> domain, something different than Energy Model or EAS. The decisions in >>>> the scheduler would be different. >>>> >>>> I can merge 1/3 and 3/3 if you like, though. >>> >>> I understand now that their independent. Still, they are part of one >>> goal to tune the scheduler for Exynos platform. Splitting these looks >>> too much, like enabling multiple drivers one after another. >>> >>> However if you provide numbers for each of cases (before patches, multi >>> core scheduler, energy model with DTS), then I see benefit of splitting >>> it. Each commit would have its own rationale. I am not sure if it is >>> worth such investigation - that's just defconfig... distros might ignore >>> it anyway. >> >> Good point, and I agree that it would require more investigation, for >> which unfortunately I don't have currently spare cycles. >> >> Should I merge patch 1/3 and 3/3 and send the v2 with a cover letter >> which would have the test results? > > Yes, let's do this way. Thank you, I will send the v2 then. Regards, Lukasz > > Thanks for working on this! > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >