Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] HID: i2c-hid: Reorganize to allow supporting goodix,gt7375p

[Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:35 PM Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:05 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 7:09 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> > <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I wanted to apply the series yesterday, but for these kinds of changes
> > > > I like giving it a spin on actual hardware. Turns out that my XPS-13
> > > > can not boot to v5.11-rc2, which makes testing the new branch slightly
> > > > more difficult.
> > > >
> > > > I'll give it a spin next week, but I think I should be able to land it for 5.12.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding the defconfig conflict, no worries, we can handle it with
> > > > Stephen and Linus.
> > > >
> > >
> > > After 2 full kernel bisects (I messed up the first because I am an
> > > idiot and inverted good and bad after the first reboot), I found my
> > > culprit, and I was able to test the series today.
> > >
> > > The series works fine regarding enumeration and removing of devices,
> > > but it prevents my system from being suspended. If I rmmod
> > > i2c-hid-acpi, suspend works fine, but if it is present, it immediately
> > > comes back, which makes me think that something must be wrong.
> > >
> > > I also just reverted the series and confirmed that suspend/resume now
> > > works, meaning that patch 1/4 needs to be checked.
> >
> > Can you give me any hints about what type of failure you're seeing?
> > Any logs?  I don't have an ACPI system to test with...
>
> I don't have any logs, just that the system comes back up. There is a
> chance we are not powering the device down correctly, which triggers
> an IRQ and which puts the system back on.
>
> >
> > Is there any chance that some type of userspace / udev rule is getting
> > tripped up by the driver being renamed?  We ran into something like
> > this recently on Chrome OS where we had a tool that was hardcoded to
> > look for "i2c-hid" and needed to be adapted to account for the new
> > driver name.  Often userspace tweaks with wakeup rules based on driver
> > name...
>
> I don't think there is anything like that on a regular desktop.
>
> >
> > I'll go stare at the code now and see if anything jumps out.
> >
>
> Thanks, but don't spend too much time on it, unless something really
> jumps out. I'll debug that tomorrow. It's much easier with an actual
> device than by just looking at the code.
>

Well, that's weird. Now suspend resume works reliably even with your
series. It could just have been that the lid sensor was too close to a
magnet or something like that. Though while testing the old version of
i2c-hid, it was working... Such a mystery :)

Anyway, while trying to dig up that now-non-issue, I got the following patch
that you likely want to squash into 1/4:

---

diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
index 0f86060f01b4..dd6d9f74e7e7 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
  struct i2c_hid_acpi {
         struct i2chid_ops ops;
         struct i2c_client *client;
-       bool power_fixed;
  };

  static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_hid_acpi_blacklist[] = {
@@ -75,25 +74,6 @@ static int i2c_hid_acpi_get_descriptor(struct i2c_client *client)
         return hid_descriptor_address;
  }

-static int i2c_hid_acpi_power_up(struct i2chid_ops *ops)
-{
-       struct i2c_hid_acpi *ihid_of =
-               container_of(ops, struct i2c_hid_acpi, ops);
-       struct device *dev = &ihid_of->client->dev;
-       struct acpi_device *adev;
-
-       /* Only need to call acpi_device_fix_up_power() the first time */
-       if (ihid_of->power_fixed)
-               return 0;
-       ihid_of->power_fixed = true;
-
-       adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
-       if (adev)
-               acpi_device_fix_up_power(adev);
-
-       return 0;
-}
-
  static void i2c_hid_acpi_shutdown_tail(struct i2chid_ops *ops)
  {
         struct i2c_hid_acpi *ihid_of =
@@ -107,6 +87,7 @@ static int i2c_hid_acpi_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
  {
         struct device *dev = &client->dev;
         struct i2c_hid_acpi *ihid_acpi;
+       struct acpi_device *adev;
         u16 hid_descriptor_address;
         int ret;

@@ -115,7 +96,6 @@ static int i2c_hid_acpi_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
                 return -ENOMEM;

         ihid_acpi->client = client;
-       ihid_acpi->ops.power_up = i2c_hid_acpi_power_up;
         ihid_acpi->ops.shutdown_tail = i2c_hid_acpi_shutdown_tail;

         ret = i2c_hid_acpi_get_descriptor(client);
@@ -123,6 +103,10 @@ static int i2c_hid_acpi_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
                 return ret;
         hid_descriptor_address = ret;

+       adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+       if (adev)
+               acpi_device_fix_up_power(adev);
+
         if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0) {
                 device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
                 device_set_wakeup_enable(dev, false);


---

This allows to keep the powering ordering of the old i2c-hid module
(power up before setting device wakeup capable), and simplify the
not so obvious power_fixed field of struct i2c_hid_acpi.

(I can also send it as a followup on the series if you prefer).

Cheers,
Benjamin