linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker
       [not found] <20220112211258.21115-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
@ 2022-01-12 21:12 ` Chang S. Bae
  2023-06-05 10:52   ` Bagas Sanjaya
  2022-01-12 21:12 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
       [not found] ` <20230410225936.8940-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2022-01-12 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-crypto, dm-devel, herbert, ebiggers, ardb, x86, luto, tglx,
	bp, dave.hansen, mingo
  Cc: linux-kernel, dan.j.williams, charishma1.gairuboyina,
	kumar.n.dwarakanath, ravi.v.shankar, chang.seok.bae, linux-doc

Document the overview of the feature along with relevant consideration when
provisioning dm-crypt volumes with AES-KL instead of AES-NI.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from RFC v2:
* Add as a new patch.
---
 Documentation/x86/index.rst     |  1 +
 Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/index.rst b/Documentation/x86/index.rst
index f498f1d36cd3..bbea47ea10f6 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/index.rst
@@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ x86-specific Documentation
    features
    elf_auxvec
    xstate
+   keylocker
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst b/Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e65d936ef199
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==============
+x86 Key Locker
+==============
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Key Locker is a CPU feature feature to reduce key exfiltration
+opportunities while maintaining a programming interface similar to AES-NI.
+It converts the AES key into an encoded form, called the 'key handle'. The
+key handle is a wrapped version of the clear-text key where the wrapping
+key has limited exposure. Once converted, all subsequent data encryption
+using new AES instructions (AES-KL) uses this key handle, reducing the
+exposure of private key material in memory.
+
+Internal Wrapping Key (IWKey)
+=============================
+
+The CPU-internal wrapping key is an entity in a software-invisible CPU
+state. On every system boot, a new key is loaded. So the key handle that
+was encoded by the old wrapping key is no longer usable on system shutdown
+or reboot.
+
+And the key may be lost on the following exceptional situation upon wakeup:
+
+IWKey Restore Failure
+---------------------
+
+The CPU state is volatile with the ACPI S3/4 sleep states. When the system
+supports those states, the key has to be backed up so that it is restored
+on wake up. The kernel saves the key in non-volatile media.
+
+The event of an IWKey restore failure upon resume from suspend, all
+established key handles become invalid. In flight dm-crypt operations
+receive error results from pending operations. In the likely scenario that
+dm-crypt is hosting the root filesystem the recovery is identical to if a
+storage controller failed to resume from suspend, reboot. If the volume
+impacted by an IWKey restore failure is a data-volume then it is possible
+that I/O errors on that volume do not bring down the rest of the system.
+However, a reboot is still required because the kernel will have
+soft-disabled Key Locker. Upon the failure, the crypto library code will
+return -ENODEV on every AES-KL function call. The Key Locker implementation
+only loads a new IWKey at initial boot, not any time after like resume from
+suspend.
+
+Use Case and Non-use Cases
+==========================
+
+Bare metal disk encryption is the only intended use case.
+
+Userspace usage is not supported because there is no ABI provided to
+communicate and coordinate wrapping-key restore failure to userspace. For
+now, key restore failures are only coordinated with kernel users. But the
+kernel can not prevent userspace from using the feature's AES instructions
+('AES-KL') when the feature has been enabled. So, the lack of userspace
+support is only documented, not actively enforced.
+
+Key Locker is not expected to be advertised to guest VMs and the kernel
+implementation ignores it even if the VMM enumerates the capability. The
+expectation is that a guest VM wants private IWKey state, but the
+architecture does not provide that. An emulation of that capability, by
+caching per VM IWKeys in memory, defeats the purpose of Key Locker. The
+backup / restore facility is also not performant enough to be suitable for
+guest VM context switches.
+
+AES Instruction Set
+===================
+
+The feature accompanies a new AES instruction set. This instruction set is
+analogous to AES-NI. A set of AES-NI instructions can be mapped to an
+AES-KL instruction. For example, AESENC128KL is responsible for ten rounds
+of transformation, which is equivalent to nine times AESENC and one
+AESENCLAST in AES-NI.
+
+But they have some notable differences:
+
+* AES-KL provides a secure data transformation using an encrypted key.
+
+* If an invalid key handle is provided, e.g. a corrupted one or a handle
+  restriction failure, the instruction fails with setting RFLAGS.ZF. The
+  crypto library implementation includes the flag check to return an error
+  code. Note that the flag is also set when the internal wrapping key is
+  changed because of missing backup.
+
+* AES-KL implements support for 128-bit and 256-bit keys, but there is no
+  AES-KL instruction to process an 192-bit key. But there is no AES-KL
+  instruction to process a 192-bit key. The AES-KL cipher implementation
+  logs a warning message with a 192-bit key and then falls back to AES-NI.
+  So, this 192-bit key-size limitation is only documented, not enforced. It
+  means the key will remain in clear-text in memory. This is to meet Linux
+  crypto-cipher expectation that each implementation must support all the
+  AES-compliant key sizes.
+
+* Some AES-KL hardware implementation may have noticeable performance
+  overhead when compared with AES-NI instructions.
+
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for Key Locker
       [not found] <20220112211258.21115-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2022-01-12 21:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker Chang S. Bae
@ 2022-01-12 21:12 ` Chang S. Bae
       [not found] ` <20230410225936.8940-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2022-01-12 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-crypto, dm-devel, herbert, ebiggers, ardb, x86, luto, tglx,
	bp, dave.hansen, mingo
  Cc: linux-kernel, dan.j.williams, charishma1.gairuboyina,
	kumar.n.dwarakanath, ravi.v.shankar, chang.seok.bae, linux-doc

Add CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER to gate whether Key Locker is initialized at boot.
The option is selected by the Key Locker cipher module CRYPTO_AES_KL (to be
added in a later patch).

Add a new command line option "nokeylocker" to optionally override the
default CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER=y behavior.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from RFC v2:
* Make the option selected by CRYPTO_AES_KL. (Dan Williams)
* Massage the changelog and the config option description.
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  2 ++
 arch/x86/Kconfig                                |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c                    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 2fba82431efb..30ed18fbdea3 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3405,6 +3405,8 @@
 
 	nohugevmalloc	[PPC] Disable kernel huge vmalloc mappings.
 
+	nokeylocker	[X86] Disable Key Locker hardware feature.
+
 	nosmt		[KNL,S390] Disable symmetric multithreading (SMT).
 			Equivalent to smt=1.
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 5c2ccb85f2ef..191bd4a941eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1864,6 +1864,9 @@ config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
 
 	  If unsure, say y.
 
+config X86_KEYLOCKER
+	bool
+
 choice
 	prompt "TSX enable mode"
 	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 23b4aa437c1e..db1fc9ff0fe3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -364,6 +364,22 @@ static __always_inline void setup_umip(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 /* These bits should not change their value after CPU init is finished. */
 static const unsigned long cr4_pinned_mask =
 	X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_UMIP | X86_CR4_FSGSBASE;
+
+static __init int x86_nokeylocker_setup(char *arg)
+{
+	/* Expect an exact match without trailing characters. */
+	if (strlen(arg))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER))
+		return 1;
+
+	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER);
+	pr_info("x86/keylocker: Disabled by kernel command line.\n");
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("nokeylocker", x86_nokeylocker_setup);
+
 static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE_RO(cr_pinning);
 static unsigned long cr4_pinned_bits __ro_after_init;
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker
       [not found] ` <20230410225936.8940-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
@ 2023-04-10 22:59   ` Chang S. Bae
  2023-04-10 22:59   ` [PATCH v6 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
       [not found]   ` <20230524165717.14062-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2023-04-10 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo, x86,
	herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar,
	chang.seok.bae, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, H. Peter Anvin,
	Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc

Document the overview of the feature along with relevant consideration when
provisioning dm-crypt volumes with AES-KL instead of AES-NI.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from v5:
* Fix a typo: 'feature feature' -> 'feature'

Changes from RFC v2:
* Add as a new patch.

The preview is available here:
  https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/intel-staging/keylocker/kdoc/x86/keylocker.html
---
 Documentation/x86/index.rst     |  1 +
 Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/index.rst b/Documentation/x86/index.rst
index 8ac64d7de4dc..669c239c009f 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/index.rst
@@ -43,3 +43,4 @@ x86-specific Documentation
    features
    elf_auxvec
    xstate
+   keylocker
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst b/Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3b405fade7d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/x86/keylocker.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==============
+x86 Key Locker
+==============
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Key Locker is a CPU feature to reduce key exfiltration opportunities
+while maintaining a programming interface similar to AES-NI. It
+converts the AES key into an encoded form, called the 'key handle'.
+The key handle is a wrapped version of the clear-text key where the
+wrapping key has limited exposure. Once converted, all subsequent data
+encryption using new AES instructions (AES-KL) uses this key handle,
+reducing the exposure of private key material in memory.
+
+Internal Wrapping Key (IWKey)
+=============================
+
+The CPU-internal wrapping key is an entity in a software-invisible CPU
+state. On every system boot, a new key is loaded. So the key handle that
+was encoded by the old wrapping key is no longer usable on system shutdown
+or reboot.
+
+And the key may be lost on the following exceptional situation upon wakeup:
+
+IWKey Restore Failure
+---------------------
+
+The CPU state is volatile with the ACPI S3/4 sleep states. When the system
+supports those states, the key has to be backed up so that it is restored
+on wake up. The kernel saves the key in non-volatile media.
+
+The event of an IWKey restore failure upon resume from suspend, all
+established key handles become invalid. In flight dm-crypt operations
+receive error results from pending operations. In the likely scenario that
+dm-crypt is hosting the root filesystem the recovery is identical to if a
+storage controller failed to resume from suspend, reboot. If the volume
+impacted by an IWKey restore failure is a data-volume then it is possible
+that I/O errors on that volume do not bring down the rest of the system.
+However, a reboot is still required because the kernel will have
+soft-disabled Key Locker. Upon the failure, the crypto library code will
+return -ENODEV on every AES-KL function call. The Key Locker implementation
+only loads a new IWKey at initial boot, not any time after like resume from
+suspend.
+
+Use Case and Non-use Cases
+==========================
+
+Bare metal disk encryption is the only intended use case.
+
+Userspace usage is not supported because there is no ABI provided to
+communicate and coordinate wrapping-key restore failure to userspace. For
+now, key restore failures are only coordinated with kernel users. But the
+kernel can not prevent userspace from using the feature's AES instructions
+('AES-KL') when the feature has been enabled. So, the lack of userspace
+support is only documented, not actively enforced.
+
+Key Locker is not expected to be advertised to guest VMs and the kernel
+implementation ignores it even if the VMM enumerates the capability. The
+expectation is that a guest VM wants private IWKey state, but the
+architecture does not provide that. An emulation of that capability, by
+caching per VM IWKeys in memory, defeats the purpose of Key Locker. The
+backup / restore facility is also not performant enough to be suitable for
+guest VM context switches.
+
+AES Instruction Set
+===================
+
+The feature accompanies a new AES instruction set. This instruction set is
+analogous to AES-NI. A set of AES-NI instructions can be mapped to an
+AES-KL instruction. For example, AESENC128KL is responsible for ten rounds
+of transformation, which is equivalent to nine times AESENC and one
+AESENCLAST in AES-NI.
+
+But they have some notable differences:
+
+* AES-KL provides a secure data transformation using an encrypted key.
+
+* If an invalid key handle is provided, e.g. a corrupted one or a handle
+  restriction failure, the instruction fails with setting RFLAGS.ZF. The
+  crypto library implementation includes the flag check to return an error
+  code. Note that the flag is also set when the internal wrapping key is
+  changed because of missing backup.
+
+* AES-KL implements support for 128-bit and 256-bit keys, but there is no
+  AES-KL instruction to process an 192-bit key. But there is no AES-KL
+  instruction to process a 192-bit key. The AES-KL cipher implementation
+  logs a warning message with a 192-bit key and then falls back to AES-NI.
+  So, this 192-bit key-size limitation is only documented, not enforced. It
+  means the key will remain in clear-text in memory. This is to meet Linux
+  crypto-cipher expectation that each implementation must support all the
+  AES-compliant key sizes.
+
+* Some AES-KL hardware implementation may have noticeable performance
+  overhead when compared with AES-NI instructions.
+
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for Key Locker
       [not found] ` <20230410225936.8940-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2023-04-10 22:59   ` [PATCH v6 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
@ 2023-04-10 22:59   ` Chang S. Bae
       [not found]   ` <20230524165717.14062-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2023-04-10 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo, x86,
	herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar,
	chang.seok.bae, Jonathan Corbet, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov,
	H. Peter Anvin, linux-doc

Add CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER to gate whether Key Locker is initialized at boot.
The option is selected by the Key Locker cipher module CRYPTO_AES_KL (to be
added in a later patch).

Add a new command line option "nokeylocker" to optionally override the
default CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER=y behavior.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from RFC v2:
* Make the option selected by CRYPTO_AES_KL. (Dan Williams)
* Massage the changelog and the config option description.
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  2 ++
 arch/x86/Kconfig                                |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c                    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 5f2ec4b0f927..6534e6217e56 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3655,6 +3655,8 @@
 
 	nohugevmalloc	[KNL,X86,PPC,ARM64] Disable kernel huge vmalloc mappings.
 
+	nokeylocker	[X86] Disable Key Locker hardware feature.
+
 	nosmt		[KNL,S390] Disable symmetric multithreading (SMT).
 			Equivalent to smt=1.
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index c94297369448..91f2063ab283 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1894,6 +1894,9 @@ config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
 
 	  If unsure, say y.
 
+config X86_KEYLOCKER
+	bool
+
 choice
 	prompt "TSX enable mode"
 	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index a1edd5997e0a..c5550b8f030d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -419,6 +419,22 @@ static __always_inline void setup_umip(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 static const unsigned long cr4_pinned_mask =
 	X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_UMIP |
 	X86_CR4_FSGSBASE | X86_CR4_CET;
+
+static __init int x86_nokeylocker_setup(char *arg)
+{
+	/* Expect an exact match without trailing characters. */
+	if (strlen(arg))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER))
+		return 1;
+
+	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER);
+	pr_info("x86/keylocker: Disabled by kernel command line.\n");
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("nokeylocker", x86_nokeylocker_setup);
+
 static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE_RO(cr_pinning);
 static unsigned long cr4_pinned_bits __ro_after_init;
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker
       [not found]   ` <20230524165717.14062-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
@ 2023-05-24 16:57     ` Chang S. Bae
  2023-05-24 16:57     ` [PATCH v7 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
       [not found]     ` <20230603152227.12335-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2023-05-24 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, elliott, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo,
	x86, herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck,
	chang.seok.bae, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Jonathan Corbet,
	linux-doc

Document the overview of the feature along with relevant consideration
when provisioning dm-crypt volumes with AES-KL instead of AES-NI.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from v6:
* Rebase on the upstream -- commit ff61f0791ce9 ("docs: move x86
  documentation into Documentation/arch/"). (Nathan Huckleberry)
* Remove a duplicated sentence -- 'But there is no AES-KL instruction
  to process a 192-bit key.'
* Update the text for clarity and readability:
  - Clarify the error code and exemplify the backup failure
  - Use 'wrapping key' instead of less readable 'IWKey'

Changes from v5:
* Fix a typo: 'feature feature' -> 'feature'

Changes from RFC v2:
* Add as a new patch.

The preview is available here:
  https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/intel-staging/keylocker/kdoc/arch/x86/keylocker.html
---
 Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst     |  1 +
 Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst
index c73d133fd37c..256359c24669 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst
@@ -42,3 +42,4 @@ x86-specific Documentation
    features
    elf_auxvec
    xstate
+   keylocker
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5557b8d0659a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==============
+x86 Key Locker
+==============
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Key Locker is a CPU feature to reduce key exfiltration opportunities
+while maintaining a programming interface similar to AES-NI. It
+converts the AES key into an encoded form, called the 'key handle'.
+The key handle is a wrapped version of the clear-text key where the
+wrapping key has limited exposure. Once converted, all subsequent data
+encryption using new AES instructions (AES-KL) uses this key handle,
+reducing the exposure of private key material in memory.
+
+CPU-internal Wrapping Key
+=========================
+
+The CPU-internal wrapping key is an entity in a software-invisible CPU
+state. On every system boot, a new key is loaded. So the key handle that
+was encoded by the old wrapping key is no longer usable on system shutdown
+or reboot.
+
+And the key may be lost on the following exceptional situation upon wakeup:
+
+Wrapping Key Restore Failure
+----------------------------
+
+The CPU state is volatile with the ACPI S3/4 sleep states. When the system
+supports those states, the key has to be backed up so that it is restored
+on wake up. The kernel saves the key in non-volatile media.
+
+The event of a wrapping key restore failure upon resume from suspend, all
+established key handles become invalid. In flight dm-crypt operations
+receive error results from pending operations. In the likely scenario that
+dm-crypt is hosting the root filesystem the recovery is identical to if a
+storage controller failed to resume from suspend, reboot. If the volume
+impacted by a wrapping key restore failure is a data-volume then it is
+possible that I/O errors on that volume do not bring down the rest of the
+system. However, a reboot is still required because the kernel will have
+soft-disabled Key Locker. Upon the failure, the crypto library code will
+return -ENODEV on every AES-KL function call. The Key Locker implementation
+only loads a new wrapping key at initial boot, not any time after like
+resume from suspend.
+
+Use Case and Non-use Cases
+==========================
+
+Bare metal disk encryption is the only intended use case.
+
+Userspace usage is not supported because there is no ABI provided to
+communicate and coordinate wrapping-key restore failure to userspace. For
+now, key restore failures are only coordinated with kernel users. But the
+kernel can not prevent userspace from using the feature's AES instructions
+('AES-KL') when the feature has been enabled. So, the lack of userspace
+support is only documented, not actively enforced.
+
+Key Locker is not expected to be advertised to guest VMs and the kernel
+implementation ignores it even if the VMM enumerates the capability. The
+expectation is that a guest VM wants private wrapping key state, but the
+architecture does not provide that. An emulation of that capability, by
+caching per-VM wrapping keys in memory, defeats the purpose of Key Locker.
+The backup / restore facility is also not performant enough to be suitable
+for guest VM context switches.
+
+AES Instruction Set
+===================
+
+The feature accompanies a new AES instruction set. This instruction set is
+analogous to AES-NI. A set of AES-NI instructions can be mapped to an
+AES-KL instruction. For example, AESENC128KL is responsible for ten rounds
+of transformation, which is equivalent to nine times AESENC and one
+AESENCLAST in AES-NI.
+
+But they have some notable differences:
+
+* AES-KL provides a secure data transformation using an encrypted key.
+
+* If an invalid key handle is provided, e.g. a corrupted one or a handle
+  restriction failure, the instruction fails with setting RFLAGS.ZF. The
+  crypto library implementation includes the flag check to return -EINVAL.
+  Note that this flag is also set if the wrapping key is changed, e.g.,
+  because of the backup error.
+
+* AES-KL implements support for 128-bit and 256-bit keys, but there is no
+  AES-KL instruction to process an 192-bit key. The AES-KL cipher
+  implementation logs a warning message with a 192-bit key and then falls
+  back to AES-NI. So, this 192-bit key-size limitation is only documented,
+  not enforced. It means the key will remain in clear-text in memory. This
+  is to meet Linux crypto-cipher expectation that each implementation must
+  support all the AES-compliant key sizes.
+
+* Some AES-KL hardware implementation may have noticeable performance
+  overhead when compared with AES-NI instructions.
+
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v7 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for Key Locker
       [not found]   ` <20230524165717.14062-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2023-05-24 16:57     ` [PATCH v7 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
@ 2023-05-24 16:57     ` Chang S. Bae
       [not found]     ` <20230603152227.12335-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2023-05-24 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, elliott, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo,
	x86, herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck,
	chang.seok.bae, Jonathan Corbet, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	linux-doc

Add CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER to gate whether Key Locker is initialized at
boot. The option is selected by the Key Locker cipher module
CRYPTO_AES_KL (to be added in a later patch).

Add a new command line option "nokeylocker" to optionally override the
default CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER=y behavior.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from v6:
* Rebase on the upstream: commit a894a8a56b57 ("Documentation:
  kernel-parameters: sort all "no..." parameters")

Changes from RFC v2:
* Make the option selected by CRYPTO_AES_KL. (Dan Williams)
* Massage the changelog and the config option description.
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  2 ++
 arch/x86/Kconfig                                |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c                    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index c1247ec4589a..b42fc53cbcf9 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3749,6 +3749,8 @@
 			kernel and module base offset ASLR (Address Space
 			Layout Randomization).
 
+	nokeylocker     [X86] Disable Key Locker hardware feature.
+
 	no-kvmapf	[X86,KVM] Disable paravirtualized asynchronous page
 			fault handling.
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index a98c5f82be48..f9788b477db1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1879,6 +1879,9 @@ config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
 
 	  If unsure, say y.
 
+config X86_KEYLOCKER
+	bool
+
 choice
 	prompt "TSX enable mode"
 	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 5882ff6e3c6b..718ff1b1d6dd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -402,6 +402,22 @@ static __always_inline void setup_umip(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 static const unsigned long cr4_pinned_mask =
 	X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_UMIP |
 	X86_CR4_FSGSBASE | X86_CR4_CET;
+
+static __init int x86_nokeylocker_setup(char *arg)
+{
+	/* Expect an exact match without trailing characters. */
+	if (strlen(arg))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER))
+		return 1;
+
+	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER);
+	pr_info("x86/keylocker: Disabled by kernel command line.\n");
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("nokeylocker", x86_nokeylocker_setup);
+
 static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE_RO(cr_pinning);
 static unsigned long cr4_pinned_bits __ro_after_init;
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker
       [not found]     ` <20230603152227.12335-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
@ 2023-06-03 15:22       ` Chang S. Bae
  2023-06-05 10:54         ` Bagas Sanjaya
  2023-06-06  2:17         ` Randy Dunlap
  2023-06-03 15:22       ` [PATCH v8 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2023-06-03 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, elliott, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo,
	x86, herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck,
	chang.seok.bae, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Jonathan Corbet,
	linux-doc

Document the overview of the feature along with relevant consideration
when provisioning dm-crypt volumes with AES-KL instead of AES-NI.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from v6:
* Rebase on the upstream -- commit ff61f0791ce9 ("docs: move x86
  documentation into Documentation/arch/"). (Nathan Huckleberry)
* Remove a duplicated sentence -- 'But there is no AES-KL instruction
  to process a 192-bit key.'
* Update the text for clarity and readability:
  - Clarify the error code and exemplify the backup failure
  - Use 'wrapping key' instead of less readable 'IWKey'

Changes from v5:
* Fix a typo: 'feature feature' -> 'feature'

Changes from RFC v2:
* Add as a new patch.

The preview is available here:
  https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/intel-staging/keylocker/kdoc/arch/x86/keylocker.html
---
 Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst     |  1 +
 Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst
index c73d133fd37c..256359c24669 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst
@@ -42,3 +42,4 @@ x86-specific Documentation
    features
    elf_auxvec
    xstate
+   keylocker
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5557b8d0659a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==============
+x86 Key Locker
+==============
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Key Locker is a CPU feature to reduce key exfiltration opportunities
+while maintaining a programming interface similar to AES-NI. It
+converts the AES key into an encoded form, called the 'key handle'.
+The key handle is a wrapped version of the clear-text key where the
+wrapping key has limited exposure. Once converted, all subsequent data
+encryption using new AES instructions (AES-KL) uses this key handle,
+reducing the exposure of private key material in memory.
+
+CPU-internal Wrapping Key
+=========================
+
+The CPU-internal wrapping key is an entity in a software-invisible CPU
+state. On every system boot, a new key is loaded. So the key handle that
+was encoded by the old wrapping key is no longer usable on system shutdown
+or reboot.
+
+And the key may be lost on the following exceptional situation upon wakeup:
+
+Wrapping Key Restore Failure
+----------------------------
+
+The CPU state is volatile with the ACPI S3/4 sleep states. When the system
+supports those states, the key has to be backed up so that it is restored
+on wake up. The kernel saves the key in non-volatile media.
+
+The event of a wrapping key restore failure upon resume from suspend, all
+established key handles become invalid. In flight dm-crypt operations
+receive error results from pending operations. In the likely scenario that
+dm-crypt is hosting the root filesystem the recovery is identical to if a
+storage controller failed to resume from suspend, reboot. If the volume
+impacted by a wrapping key restore failure is a data-volume then it is
+possible that I/O errors on that volume do not bring down the rest of the
+system. However, a reboot is still required because the kernel will have
+soft-disabled Key Locker. Upon the failure, the crypto library code will
+return -ENODEV on every AES-KL function call. The Key Locker implementation
+only loads a new wrapping key at initial boot, not any time after like
+resume from suspend.
+
+Use Case and Non-use Cases
+==========================
+
+Bare metal disk encryption is the only intended use case.
+
+Userspace usage is not supported because there is no ABI provided to
+communicate and coordinate wrapping-key restore failure to userspace. For
+now, key restore failures are only coordinated with kernel users. But the
+kernel can not prevent userspace from using the feature's AES instructions
+('AES-KL') when the feature has been enabled. So, the lack of userspace
+support is only documented, not actively enforced.
+
+Key Locker is not expected to be advertised to guest VMs and the kernel
+implementation ignores it even if the VMM enumerates the capability. The
+expectation is that a guest VM wants private wrapping key state, but the
+architecture does not provide that. An emulation of that capability, by
+caching per-VM wrapping keys in memory, defeats the purpose of Key Locker.
+The backup / restore facility is also not performant enough to be suitable
+for guest VM context switches.
+
+AES Instruction Set
+===================
+
+The feature accompanies a new AES instruction set. This instruction set is
+analogous to AES-NI. A set of AES-NI instructions can be mapped to an
+AES-KL instruction. For example, AESENC128KL is responsible for ten rounds
+of transformation, which is equivalent to nine times AESENC and one
+AESENCLAST in AES-NI.
+
+But they have some notable differences:
+
+* AES-KL provides a secure data transformation using an encrypted key.
+
+* If an invalid key handle is provided, e.g. a corrupted one or a handle
+  restriction failure, the instruction fails with setting RFLAGS.ZF. The
+  crypto library implementation includes the flag check to return -EINVAL.
+  Note that this flag is also set if the wrapping key is changed, e.g.,
+  because of the backup error.
+
+* AES-KL implements support for 128-bit and 256-bit keys, but there is no
+  AES-KL instruction to process an 192-bit key. The AES-KL cipher
+  implementation logs a warning message with a 192-bit key and then falls
+  back to AES-NI. So, this 192-bit key-size limitation is only documented,
+  not enforced. It means the key will remain in clear-text in memory. This
+  is to meet Linux crypto-cipher expectation that each implementation must
+  support all the AES-compliant key sizes.
+
+* Some AES-KL hardware implementation may have noticeable performance
+  overhead when compared with AES-NI instructions.
+
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v8 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for Key Locker
       [not found]     ` <20230603152227.12335-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
  2023-06-03 15:22       ` [PATCH v8 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
@ 2023-06-03 15:22       ` Chang S. Bae
  2023-06-03 16:37         ` Borislav Petkov
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2023-06-03 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, elliott, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo,
	x86, herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck,
	chang.seok.bae, Jonathan Corbet, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
	linux-doc

Add CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER to gate whether Key Locker is initialized at
boot. The option is selected by the Key Locker cipher module
CRYPTO_AES_KL (to be added in a later patch).

Add a new command line option "nokeylocker" to optionally override the
default CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER=y behavior.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Changes from v6:
* Rebase on the upstream: commit a894a8a56b57 ("Documentation:
  kernel-parameters: sort all "no..." parameters")

Changes from RFC v2:
* Make the option selected by CRYPTO_AES_KL. (Dan Williams)
* Massage the changelog and the config option description.
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  2 ++
 arch/x86/Kconfig                                |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c                    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index c1247ec4589a..b42fc53cbcf9 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3749,6 +3749,8 @@
 			kernel and module base offset ASLR (Address Space
 			Layout Randomization).
 
+	nokeylocker     [X86] Disable Key Locker hardware feature.
+
 	no-kvmapf	[X86,KVM] Disable paravirtualized asynchronous page
 			fault handling.
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index a98c5f82be48..f9788b477db1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1879,6 +1879,9 @@ config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
 
 	  If unsure, say y.
 
+config X86_KEYLOCKER
+	bool
+
 choice
 	prompt "TSX enable mode"
 	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 5882ff6e3c6b..718ff1b1d6dd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -402,6 +402,22 @@ static __always_inline void setup_umip(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 static const unsigned long cr4_pinned_mask =
 	X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_UMIP |
 	X86_CR4_FSGSBASE | X86_CR4_CET;
+
+static __init int x86_nokeylocker_setup(char *arg)
+{
+	/* Expect an exact match without trailing characters. */
+	if (strlen(arg))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER))
+		return 1;
+
+	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER);
+	pr_info("x86/keylocker: Disabled by kernel command line.\n");
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("nokeylocker", x86_nokeylocker_setup);
+
 static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE_RO(cr_pinning);
 static unsigned long cr4_pinned_bits __ro_after_init;
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for Key Locker
  2023-06-03 15:22       ` [PATCH v8 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
@ 2023-06-03 16:37         ` Borislav Petkov
  2023-06-04 22:13           ` Chang S. Bae
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2023-06-03 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chang S. Bae
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel, ebiggers, elliott,
	gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, mingo, x86, herbert, ardb,
	dan.j.williams, bernie.keany, charishma1.gairuboyina,
	lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck, Jonathan Corbet, Ingo Molnar,
	H. Peter Anvin, linux-doc

On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 08:22:24AM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> +static __init int x86_nokeylocker_setup(char *arg)
> +{
> +	/* Expect an exact match without trailing characters. */
> +	if (strlen(arg))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER);
> +	pr_info("x86/keylocker: Disabled by kernel command line.\n");
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("nokeylocker", x86_nokeylocker_setup);

Can we stop adding those just to remove them at some point later but
simply do:

clearcpuid=keylocker

?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for Key Locker
  2023-06-03 16:37         ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2023-06-04 22:13           ` Chang S. Bae
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2023-06-04 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Borislav Petkov
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel, ebiggers, elliott,
	gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, mingo, x86, herbert, ardb,
	dan.j.williams, bernie.keany, charishma1.gairuboyina,
	lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck, Jonathan Corbet, Ingo Molnar,
	H. Peter Anvin, linux-doc

On 6/3/2023 9:37 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 08:22:24AM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> +static __init int x86_nokeylocker_setup(char *arg)
>> +{
>> +	/* Expect an exact match without trailing characters. */
>> +	if (strlen(arg))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_KEYLOCKER);
>> +	pr_info("x86/keylocker: Disabled by kernel command line.\n");
>> +	return 1;
>> +}
>> +__setup("nokeylocker", x86_nokeylocker_setup);
> 
> Can we stop adding those just to remove them at some point later but
> simply do:
> 
> clearcpuid=keylocker
> 
> ?

Oh, I was not sure about this policy. Thanks, now I'm glad that I have 
confidence in removing this.

Chang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker
  2022-01-12 21:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker Chang S. Bae
@ 2023-06-05 10:52   ` Bagas Sanjaya
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-06-05 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chang S. Bae, linux-crypto, dm-devel, herbert, ebiggers, ardb,
	x86, luto, tglx, bp, dave.hansen, mingo
  Cc: linux-kernel, dan.j.williams, charishma1.gairuboyina,
	kumar.n.dwarakanath, ravi.v.shankar, linux-doc

On 1/13/22 04:12, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> +==============
> +x86 Key Locker
> +==============
> +
> +Introduction
> +============
> +
> +Key Locker is a CPU feature feature to reduce key exfiltration
> +opportunities while maintaining a programming interface similar to AES-NI.
> +It converts the AES key into an encoded form, called the 'key handle'. The
> +key handle is a wrapped version of the clear-text key where the wrapping
> +key has limited exposure. Once converted, all subsequent data encryption
> +using new AES instructions (AES-KL) uses this key handle, reducing the
> +exposure of private key material in memory.
> +
> +Internal Wrapping Key (IWKey)
> +=============================
> +
> +The CPU-internal wrapping key is an entity in a software-invisible CPU
> +state. On every system boot, a new key is loaded. So the key handle that
> +was encoded by the old wrapping key is no longer usable on system shutdown
> +or reboot.
> +
> +And the key may be lost on the following exceptional situation upon wakeup:
> +
> +IWKey Restore Failure
> +---------------------
> +
> +The CPU state is volatile with the ACPI S3/4 sleep states. When the system
> +supports those states, the key has to be backed up so that it is restored
> +on wake up. The kernel saves the key in non-volatile media.
> +
> +The event of an IWKey restore failure upon resume from suspend, all
> +established key handles become invalid. In flight dm-crypt operations
> +receive error results from pending operations. In the likely scenario that
> +dm-crypt is hosting the root filesystem the recovery is identical to if a
> +storage controller failed to resume from suspend, reboot. If the volume
                                            "suspend and reboot"?
> +impacted by an IWKey restore failure is a data-volume then it is possible
> +that I/O errors on that volume do not bring down the rest of the system.
> +However, a reboot is still required because the kernel will have
> +soft-disabled Key Locker. Upon the failure, the crypto library code will
> +return -ENODEV on every AES-KL function call. The Key Locker implementation
> +only loads a new IWKey at initial boot, not any time after like resume from
> +suspend.
> +
> +Use Case and Non-use Cases
> +==========================
> +
> +Bare metal disk encryption is the only intended use case.
> +
> +Userspace usage is not supported because there is no ABI provided to
> +communicate and coordinate wrapping-key restore failure to userspace. For
> +now, key restore failures are only coordinated with kernel users. But the
> +kernel can not prevent userspace from using the feature's AES instructions
> +('AES-KL') when the feature has been enabled. So, the lack of userspace
> +support is only documented, not actively enforced.
> +
> +Key Locker is not expected to be advertised to guest VMs and the kernel
> +implementation ignores it even if the VMM enumerates the capability. The
> +expectation is that a guest VM wants private IWKey state, but the
> +architecture does not provide that. An emulation of that capability, by
> +caching per VM IWKeys in memory, defeats the purpose of Key Locker. The
> +backup / restore facility is also not performant enough to be suitable for
> +guest VM context switches.
> +
> +AES Instruction Set
> +===================
> +
> +The feature accompanies a new AES instruction set. This instruction set is
> +analogous to AES-NI. A set of AES-NI instructions can be mapped to an
> +AES-KL instruction. For example, AESENC128KL is responsible for ten rounds
> +of transformation, which is equivalent to nine times AESENC and one
> +AESENCLAST in AES-NI.
> +
> +But they have some notable differences:
> +
> +* AES-KL provides a secure data transformation using an encrypted key.
> +
> +* If an invalid key handle is provided, e.g. a corrupted one or a handle
> +  restriction failure, the instruction fails with setting RFLAGS.ZF. The
> +  crypto library implementation includes the flag check to return an error
> +  code. Note that the flag is also set when the internal wrapping key is
> +  changed because of missing backup.
> +
> +* AES-KL implements support for 128-bit and 256-bit keys, but there is no
> +  AES-KL instruction to process an 192-bit key. But there is no AES-KL
> +  instruction to process a 192-bit key. The AES-KL cipher implementation
> +  logs a warning message with a 192-bit key and then falls back to AES-NI.
> +  So, this 192-bit key-size limitation is only documented, not enforced. It
> +  means the key will remain in clear-text in memory. This is to meet Linux
> +  crypto-cipher expectation that each implementation must support all the
> +  AES-compliant key sizes.
> +
> +* Some AES-KL hardware implementation may have noticeable performance
> +  overhead when compared with AES-NI instructions.
> +

The rest is LGTM.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker
  2023-06-03 15:22       ` [PATCH v8 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
@ 2023-06-05 10:54         ` Bagas Sanjaya
  2023-06-06  2:17         ` Randy Dunlap
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-06-05 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chang S. Bae, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, elliott, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo,
	x86, herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck,
	Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc

On 6/3/23 22:22, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> +==============
> +x86 Key Locker
> +==============
> +
> +Introduction
> +============
> +
> +Key Locker is a CPU feature to reduce key exfiltration opportunities
> +while maintaining a programming interface similar to AES-NI. It
> +converts the AES key into an encoded form, called the 'key handle'.
> +The key handle is a wrapped version of the clear-text key where the
> +wrapping key has limited exposure. Once converted, all subsequent data
> +encryption using new AES instructions (AES-KL) uses this key handle,
> +reducing the exposure of private key material in memory.
> +
> +CPU-internal Wrapping Key
> +=========================
> +
> +The CPU-internal wrapping key is an entity in a software-invisible CPU
> +state. On every system boot, a new key is loaded. So the key handle that
> +was encoded by the old wrapping key is no longer usable on system shutdown
> +or reboot.
> +
> +And the key may be lost on the following exceptional situation upon wakeup:
> +
> +Wrapping Key Restore Failure
> +----------------------------
> +
> +The CPU state is volatile with the ACPI S3/4 sleep states. When the system
> +supports those states, the key has to be backed up so that it is restored
> +on wake up. The kernel saves the key in non-volatile media.
> +
> +The event of a wrapping key restore failure upon resume from suspend, all
> +established key handles become invalid. In flight dm-crypt operations
> +receive error results from pending operations. In the likely scenario that
> +dm-crypt is hosting the root filesystem the recovery is identical to if a
> +storage controller failed to resume from suspend, reboot. If the volume
"... resume from suspend or reboot."
> +impacted by a wrapping key restore failure is a data-volume then it is
> +possible that I/O errors on that volume do not bring down the rest of the
> +system. However, a reboot is still required because the kernel will have
> +soft-disabled Key Locker. Upon the failure, the crypto library code will
> +return -ENODEV on every AES-KL function call. The Key Locker implementation
> +only loads a new wrapping key at initial boot, not any time after like
> +resume from suspend.
> +
> +Use Case and Non-use Cases
> +==========================
> +
> +Bare metal disk encryption is the only intended use case.
> +
> +Userspace usage is not supported because there is no ABI provided to
> +communicate and coordinate wrapping-key restore failure to userspace. For
> +now, key restore failures are only coordinated with kernel users. But the
> +kernel can not prevent userspace from using the feature's AES instructions
> +('AES-KL') when the feature has been enabled. So, the lack of userspace
> +support is only documented, not actively enforced.
> +
> +Key Locker is not expected to be advertised to guest VMs and the kernel
> +implementation ignores it even if the VMM enumerates the capability. The
> +expectation is that a guest VM wants private wrapping key state, but the
> +architecture does not provide that. An emulation of that capability, by
> +caching per-VM wrapping keys in memory, defeats the purpose of Key Locker.
> +The backup / restore facility is also not performant enough to be suitable
> +for guest VM context switches.
> +
> +AES Instruction Set
> +===================
> +
> +The feature accompanies a new AES instruction set. This instruction set is
> +analogous to AES-NI. A set of AES-NI instructions can be mapped to an
> +AES-KL instruction. For example, AESENC128KL is responsible for ten rounds
> +of transformation, which is equivalent to nine times AESENC and one
> +AESENCLAST in AES-NI.
> +
> +But they have some notable differences:
> +
> +* AES-KL provides a secure data transformation using an encrypted key.
> +
> +* If an invalid key handle is provided, e.g. a corrupted one or a handle
> +  restriction failure, the instruction fails with setting RFLAGS.ZF. The
> +  crypto library implementation includes the flag check to return -EINVAL.
> +  Note that this flag is also set if the wrapping key is changed, e.g.,
> +  because of the backup error.
> +
> +* AES-KL implements support for 128-bit and 256-bit keys, but there is no
> +  AES-KL instruction to process an 192-bit key. The AES-KL cipher
> +  implementation logs a warning message with a 192-bit key and then falls
> +  back to AES-NI. So, this 192-bit key-size limitation is only documented,
> +  not enforced. It means the key will remain in clear-text in memory. This
> +  is to meet Linux crypto-cipher expectation that each implementation must
> +  support all the AES-compliant key sizes.
> +
> +* Some AES-KL hardware implementation may have noticeable performance
> +  overhead when compared with AES-NI instructions.
> +

The rest is LGTM, thanks!

Anyway,

Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker
  2023-06-03 15:22       ` [PATCH v8 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
  2023-06-05 10:54         ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-06-06  2:17         ` Randy Dunlap
  2023-06-06  4:18           ` Chang S. Bae
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2023-06-06  2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chang S. Bae, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, elliott, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo,
	x86, herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck,
	Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc



On 6/3/23 08:22, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> Document the overview of the feature along with relevant consideration
> when provisioning dm-crypt volumes with AES-KL instead of AES-NI.
> 
> ---
> ---
>  Documentation/arch/x86/index.rst     |  1 +
>  Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst
> 

> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5557b8d0659a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/keylocker.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +==============
> +x86 Key Locker
> +==============
> +
> +Introduction
> +============
> +
> +Key Locker is a CPU feature to reduce key exfiltration opportunities
> +while maintaining a programming interface similar to AES-NI. It
> +converts the AES key into an encoded form, called the 'key handle'.
> +The key handle is a wrapped version of the clear-text key where the
> +wrapping key has limited exposure. Once converted, all subsequent data
> +encryption using new AES instructions (AES-KL) uses this key handle,
> +reducing the exposure of private key material in memory.
> +
> +CPU-internal Wrapping Key
> +=========================
> +
> +The CPU-internal wrapping key is an entity in a software-invisible CPU
> +state. On every system boot, a new key is loaded. So the key handle that
> +was encoded by the old wrapping key is no longer usable on system shutdown
> +or reboot.
> +
> +And the key may be lost on the following exceptional situation upon wakeup:
> +
> +Wrapping Key Restore Failure
> +----------------------------
> +
> +The CPU state is volatile with the ACPI S3/4 sleep states. When the system
> +supports those states, the key has to be backed up so that it is restored
> +on wake up. The kernel saves the key in non-volatile media.
> +
> +The event of a wrapping key restore failure upon resume from suspend, all

   Upon the event of a ...

> +established key handles become invalid. In flight dm-crypt operations
> +receive error results from pending operations. In the likely scenario that
> +dm-crypt is hosting the root filesystem the recovery is identical to if a
> +storage controller failed to resume from suspend, reboot. If the volume
> +impacted by a wrapping key restore failure is a data-volume then it is

                                                   data volume

> +possible that I/O errors on that volume do not bring down the rest of the
> +system. However, a reboot is still required because the kernel will have
> +soft-disabled Key Locker. Upon the failure, the crypto library code will
> +return -ENODEV on every AES-KL function call. The Key Locker implementation
> +only loads a new wrapping key at initial boot, not any time after like
> +resume from suspend.
> +
> +Use Case and Non-use Cases
> +==========================
> +
> +Bare metal disk encryption is the only intended use case.
> +
> +Userspace usage is not supported because there is no ABI provided to
> +communicate and coordinate wrapping-key restore failure to userspace. For
> +now, key restore failures are only coordinated with kernel users. But the
> +kernel can not prevent userspace from using the feature's AES instructions
> +('AES-KL') when the feature has been enabled. So, the lack of userspace
> +support is only documented, not actively enforced.
> +
> +Key Locker is not expected to be advertised to guest VMs and the kernel
> +implementation ignores it even if the VMM enumerates the capability. The
> +expectation is that a guest VM wants private wrapping key state, but the
> +architecture does not provide that. An emulation of that capability, by
> +caching per-VM wrapping keys in memory, defeats the purpose of Key Locker.
> +The backup / restore facility is also not performant enough to be suitable
> +for guest VM context switches.
> +
> +AES Instruction Set
> +===================
> +
> +The feature accompanies a new AES instruction set. This instruction set is
> +analogous to AES-NI. A set of AES-NI instructions can be mapped to an
> +AES-KL instruction. For example, AESENC128KL is responsible for ten rounds
> +of transformation, which is equivalent to nine times AESENC and one
> +AESENCLAST in AES-NI.
> +
> +But they have some notable differences:
> +
> +* AES-KL provides a secure data transformation using an encrypted key.
> +
> +* If an invalid key handle is provided, e.g. a corrupted one or a handle
> +  restriction failure, the instruction fails with setting RFLAGS.ZF. The
> +  crypto library implementation includes the flag check to return -EINVAL.
> +  Note that this flag is also set if the wrapping key is changed, e.g.,
> +  because of the backup error.
> +
> +* AES-KL implements support for 128-bit and 256-bit keys, but there is no
> +  AES-KL instruction to process an 192-bit key. The AES-KL cipher
> +  implementation logs a warning message with a 192-bit key and then falls
> +  back to AES-NI. So, this 192-bit key-size limitation is only documented,

Is it logged anywhere?  i.e., a kernel log message?

> +  not enforced. It means the key will remain in clear-text in memory. This
> +  is to meet Linux crypto-cipher expectation that each implementation must
> +  support all the AES-compliant key sizes.
> +
> +* Some AES-KL hardware implementation may have noticeable performance
> +  overhead when compared with AES-NI instructions.
> +

-- 
~Randy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker
  2023-06-06  2:17         ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2023-06-06  4:18           ` Chang S. Bae
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Chang S. Bae @ 2023-06-06  4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Randy Dunlap, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, dm-devel
  Cc: ebiggers, elliott, gmazyland, luto, dave.hansen, tglx, bp, mingo,
	x86, herbert, ardb, dan.j.williams, bernie.keany,
	charishma1.gairuboyina, lalithambika.krishnakumar, nhuck,
	Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Jonathan Corbet, linux-doc

On 6/5/2023 7:17 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 6/3/23 08:22, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> +
>> +* AES-KL implements support for 128-bit and 256-bit keys, but there is no
>> +  AES-KL instruction to process an 192-bit key. The AES-KL cipher
>> +  implementation logs a warning message with a 192-bit key and then falls
>> +  back to AES-NI. So, this 192-bit key-size limitation is only documented,
> 
> Is it logged anywhere?  i.e., a kernel log message?

Yes, this is the relevant change in the last patch:

 > +static int aeskl_setkey(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, void *raw_ctx, const 
u8 *in_key,
 > +			unsigned int keylen)
 > +{
...
 > +	if (unlikely(keylen == AES_KEYSIZE_192)) {
 > +		pr_warn_once("AES-KL does not support 192-bit key. Use AES-NI.\n");
...
 > +}

Thanks,
Chang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-06  4:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20220112211258.21115-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
2022-01-12 21:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document Key Locker Chang S. Bae
2023-06-05 10:52   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-01-12 21:12 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
     [not found] ` <20230410225936.8940-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
2023-04-10 22:59   ` [PATCH v6 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
2023-04-10 22:59   ` [PATCH v6 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
     [not found]   ` <20230524165717.14062-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
2023-05-24 16:57     ` [PATCH v7 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
2023-05-24 16:57     ` [PATCH v7 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
     [not found]     ` <20230603152227.12335-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
2023-06-03 15:22       ` [PATCH v8 01/12] Documentation/x86: Document " Chang S. Bae
2023-06-05 10:54         ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-06  2:17         ` Randy Dunlap
2023-06-06  4:18           ` Chang S. Bae
2023-06-03 15:22       ` [PATCH v8 09/12] x86/cpu: Add a configuration and command line option for " Chang S. Bae
2023-06-03 16:37         ` Borislav Petkov
2023-06-04 22:13           ` Chang S. Bae

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).