From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EA7C2D0C2 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D0B2085B for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727996AbgACQsb (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:31 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35078 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727912AbgACQsb (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:31 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 214C62072C; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:28 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Frank A. Cancio Bello" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, nachukannan@gmail.com, rdunlap@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] docs: ftrace: Fix minor issues in the doc Message-ID: <20200103114828.15581051@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 19:05:38 -0500 "Frank A. Cancio Bello" wrote: > I didn't want to be pushy with these minor fixes but occur to me > now that, even all seem to be clear in the latest version of the > RFC (v2) related to these fixes, a clean patchset could be expected > after such RFC. So here we go: > > Clarifies the RAM footprint of buffer_size_kb without getting into > implementation details. > > Fix typos and a small notation mistakes in the doc. > Jon, Can you take these in your tree? Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Thanks! -- Steve