From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585E1C3F68F for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 19:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA752146E for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 19:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VchTfkRH" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726657AbgAFTC3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:02:29 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:37373 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726569AbgAFTC3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:02:29 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id f129so16460132wmf.2; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:02:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to; bh=FSOZYLdeJYzx9HNM/eHVZQqHNGetz8F34rLJogrEMmw=; b=VchTfkRHWQ15fzvFurpwbHnQJzO4ovSRNlVvcBm7mlyYHD4J5jQMMP8zwzys7HmgBS FtDIhNzXVJ+U6rTOTnTv8Zdc5vP7a+myYVzERvb0l6+5dOx2r3J4SPaaIcKh0mcT/A9x QmlIe/Y5jlGBSFYYf4xVP4fWAJDAfnlhMRpcfsVnnxQb9DKVfLb5yn532WO4J36Nfb4j oWsCoVSDmdhT/w20U6HZb9v56w0Az6ny2n6RgnZrV6TFdp/K1ip0fq5l4U0Jp2xYxJVq VTmjMt/PcPSqvLlGtMkXyDM36G0xhe+t13ueF9k9hxmMKGNl74JOVLIzLolx9TAEWEay WnqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to; bh=FSOZYLdeJYzx9HNM/eHVZQqHNGetz8F34rLJogrEMmw=; b=ZpSA181m4f71lWjt7ExhftMR3mIwIca5PDzp9KqP84nnn87jdHtX6yblqU2a859IBI bxa1nBmeu87ZboI1W7zPJ7tr4MvCfOGCD35LV5wT0KrLGkbf7kmzYZLOgVSLCXWkqtFn BNc0Q2LaGPXUAA9mSAViE21l440vJJZFWOgSfnNyPULvAyoz7C2WP6Xu9Wf6pvsmrWcc ClF1Eu9gRUTcRd57FRingd957ya9USbavmGFVGNJ2QLjx7z91ID+GbwdwxbokDbLGKpr /JTGpBtQmBcROkVokU4UQCx2rBByFLDPJbXdPuv7749rABgk3aUnpRuU3AXHy7DUFjmT DZqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVUl6kK5qK6cpAOkT6hJq1yhL25Fe4vpr2ru/ITfKweHkHVpNkZ toqtt5J/HpdHlgX2kjHZK5M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzbzGbTexFibdeXL8cwzeV1stJTTJXd0fQh4ROjZbmZL+vfTazuUNacYc+Cnk//gudO8csTDw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c946:: with SMTP id i6mr35278830wml.28.1578337347235; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:02:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a02:2450:10d2:194d:74f9:b588:decc:794d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n16sm73565486wro.88.2020.01.06.11.02.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:02:26 -0800 (PST) From: SeongJae Park To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com, sj38.park@gmail.com, joel@joelfernandes.or, frextrite@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, SeongJae Park Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 6/7] doc/RCU/rcu: Use https instead of http if possible Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 20:02:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20200106190212.20255-1-sj38.park@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200106183543.GN13449@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw) Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:35:43 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:51PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com wrote: > > From: sj38.park@gmail.com > > > > From: SeongJae Park > > > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park > > > > Hi SeongJae, > > > > The patch looks fine, but I am not sure if this change is required. > > What do you think Paul? > > Thank you, Madhuparna! This change might not be absolutely required, > but it is a good change. Sorry for late reply, Madhuparna. I made this patch because I seen a commit converting http urls to https url for a document. However, I couldn't find the commit again. Maybe my confusion. So, please drop this if you have any doubt, Paul. > > SeongJae, could you please include Madhuparna's pair of Reviewed-by > tags and also make your email address consistent in your next posting? > You currently have both sj38.park@gmail.com and sjpark@amazon.de. > Either is fine. ;-) Yes, of course, and sorry for the mistake. I will use sjpark@amazon.de for this patchset. Will send the second version soon. Thanks, SeongJae Park > > Thanx, Paul > > > Thanks, > > Madhuparna > > > > --- > > Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst > > index 2a830c51477e..0e03c6ef3147 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst > > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Frequently Asked Questions > > Of these, one was allowed to lapse by the assignee, and the > > others have been contributed to the Linux kernel under GPL. > > There are now also LGPL implementations of user-level RCU > > - available (http://liburcu.org/). > > + available (https://liburcu.org/). > > > > - I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels? > > > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > >