From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA3FC282DD for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DC82080A for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728379AbgAGUJU (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:09:20 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:52660 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728358AbgAGUJU (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:09:20 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 520A66EC; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:09:18 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jose Abreu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Joao Pinto , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , "David S. Miller" , Maxime Coquelin , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Documentation: stmmac documentation improvements Message-ID: <20200107130918.205762b6@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:37:17 +0100 Jose Abreu wrote: > [ Not sure if this should go for net-next or Documentation tree. ] Patches for networking docs generally go through the networking trees; I'm assuming that will happen here as well. The changes look generally good to me, FWIW. Thanks, jon